Help Wanted: One Congressman, Qualifications Required

J.E. Dean has taken a long, hard look at Congressman Andy Harris. In the piece, and especially the comments following, I noticed something.

Nobody was hiring.

Seems like folks jumped straight to jersey picking.

If you have an extra, I’m an “L,” by the way.

So how about something radical?

Let’s treat Congress like a job.

POSITION: U.S. Representative, Maryland’s First District.

DUTIES: Vote. Show up. Read things.

REQUIREMENTS: Judgment, experience, a record you can defend without changing the subject.

PREFERRED: Answers questions from actual constituents, ideally in the same room.

NOTE: Firearms not required for the interview. Nor for the House floor. We tried that. It’s remembered mostly for the still-unexplained heater.

Now, the comments. I read them all so you don’t have to (but you should), which makes me, I suspect, the only one who intentionally ingested all sides.

One reader was thrilled to vote “Red!” Another wants you to know the Democratic Socialists are coming for your guns, your taxes and possibly your Buick up on cinder blocks.

A third posted what appeared to be a farm-policy dissertation, with footnotes, in installments, the comment section’s answer to a Senate filibuster.

A fourth has a nickname for the Congressman that I’m told is affectionate, in the way a crowbar or a ball-peen hammer is affectionate.

What went unsaid?

“Here’s what I’d look for in a job candidate.”

Nobody applied for the job. The partygoers arrived pre-locked and pre-loaded, so to speak.

I grew up a bit differently.

My father, Eugene Barber, was a Republican in the Eisenhower mold and a Marine. Parris Island, no doubt, was formative.

My mother, Dorothy May, was a Kennedy Democrat with a saucy New England edge. But we were, in a sense, nevertheless “rounded.”

One Thanksgiving featured a discussion of one George Wallace, which guaranteed indigestion before anyone carved the bird.

Nobody left the table. Nobody called anyone fascist, communist or racist.

Somebody just passed the gravy, aggressively.

Maybe it was the head of the household wielding the carving knife that proved persuasive.

That’s the thing. We’ve gone from disagreeing to subscribing, with little in between.

Addiction, even.

If politics were a twelve-step program, the first meeting would open with, “Hi, my name is America, and I’m addicted to disagreement.”

“Hi, America.”

Then somebody in the back would complain the coffee was fluoridated. Somebody else would complain it wasn’t organic.

Meanwhile, most people I know are busy living their best lives, the only ones they’ve got, for the first time.

They’re sweating the mounting bills, patching the roof after the nor’easter, trying to keep half a tank of unleaded Texas Tea in the Buick and hoping to put something, anything, on the table to eat tonight.

Have you seen the line of cars outside St. Vincent de Paul?

These folks aren’t up nights wondering whether “See Spot Run” has landed in the crosshairs of Moms for Making Sure Spot Knows His Place.

Every election, the ads—and the handful of voters on either side who will never change their minds—warn us they’re coming.

Coming for our guns, our Medicare, our kids and our taxes.

And any day now, the toaster.

They’re never coming for the toaster. Nobody wants your toaster. It’s from 1987.

Quite frankly, if I were running (and I’d lie if I said I’d never thought about it), my platform would be one issue and one issue only: the same healthcare as is available to the people who represent us should also be available to each and every single one of us in the First District.

Period.

If it’s good enough for them Congress people, it’s good enough for us.

No need to reinvent the wheel. Just expand the coverage from 435 to . . . .

See how easily I become distracted . . . .

So here’s my immodest proposal.

Read their records. Weigh the judgment. Notice who answers questions and who just answers fundraising emails.

Then vote for whoever you’d actually hire, and yes, that includes the candidate on the other team, and possibly the one your brother-in-law insists is a lizard.

If Karl Rove can cross the aisle, so can you. He’s been a Republican longer than some of you have had teeth.

The proof it can work is on the books.

The EPA came under Nixon. George H.W. Bush signed the Americans with Disabilities Act. Obama signed the Affordable Care Act. Clinton presided over balanced federal budgets.

Clean air and water don’t check your voter registration.

Neither does a wheelchair ramp.

And if your guy or gal loses, relax.

That’s why they hold these things every two or four years. It’s a do-over, with yard signs.

Nobody (let me clarify: no candidate) is perfect.

If perfection were required for office, we’d have to close the Capitol.

We’d also have to cancel the stupidity tax I’ve proposed previously, which would raise far more than any tariffs ever would.

It is a precious gift to disagree, grumble, and walk into a booth to make up our own minds.

Women and men have died so that we, right here, right now, get to do it.

That’s worth a moment of gratitude, if not silence for the fallen, right before you start posting.

Just remember, even for a millisecond, that the person on the other side of the argument puts their pants on one leg at a time, too.

Same as you.

Only they’re probably wearing the other color.

And if anyone has that spare jersey, I’m still an “L.”

AI Disclosure: The Spy and its writers may use artificial intelligence tools to support accuracy and clarity in our reporting.

5 Responses

  1. I thought this was a fair, and for the most part, unbiased piece. The title, “Help Wanted: One Congressman, Qualifications Required”, really made me stop and think about what we should expect from the person representing Maryland’s First District.
    After many years of watching our representation, I have personally become VERY disappointed with Andy Harris and with what I feel has been a lack of attention to the needs and interests of the Eastern Shore. He may have his supporters and certainly has his own record of legislative activity, but I believe constituents have every right to ask whether the person representing us is truly listening to and working for the communities here.
    For me, the upcoming election is an opportunity to take a fresh look at the candidates, their experience, their records, and , most importantly, what they actually intend to do for the Eastern Shore.
    I appreciate that this article raises those questions and encourages people to think very seriously about what qualifications and representation should look like in our next congressman.

  2. As my English teacher would tell me,
    “Keep it short.”
    In a word: Outstanding.
    Thank you for your perspective.
    Spot on.

Write a Letter to the Editor on this Article

We encourage readers to offer their point of view on this article by submitting the following form. Editing is sometimes necessary and is done at the discretion of the editorial staff. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to the Spy
Receive daily intelligence reports right to your inbox

Dr. Walley New Provider (300x500)
Ad 4 Talbot Spy Rotating Ad 300x500px Chuck Mangold Jr
Talbot Spy Free Admission.jpg
Private Duty Care 300 x 500 Jan 2024 copy
YMCA Membership generic copy.jpg
763ACTS 2020 DigitalAd BaC 300x500 final.jpg
Forum Spy Ad 8 20 26
Studio B Sept 2026 copy
Spy Donor Thank You Ad
Morgan Stanley 1 copy
RandRspy
Piazza Market April Vietti wine.jpg
0.jpeg
Avalon May 2023 copy.jpg
Wye School 300 x 500.jpg
healthcare careers ad 300x500(1)
unnamed
Jan Kirsh October blue grape screen October
Allegro Academy August 2026
massoni castelli DR Spy Artboard 1
2.png
Talbot Spy online ad VFi 8.11.22.jpg
MSO March 2026
unnamed
TalbotSpy Ad 2023.jpg
Chesapeake Bay Fund 2.jpg
FOT TheSpy
FAS NOSE SPY 300x500.jpg
Qlarant Spy ad 8 13 2025.jpg
eswa ad talbot spy FINAL
Brampton Grape Expectations July 2026 ver 2 copy
massoni castelli DR Spy Artboard 1