MENU

Sections

  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Editors and Writers
    • Join our Mailing List
    • Letters to Editor Policy
    • Advertising & Underwriting
    • Code of Ethics
    • Privacy
    • Talbot Spy Terms of Use
  • Arts
  • Food & Garden
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Habitat
  • Health
  • Local Life
  • Public Affairs
  • Points of View
  • Senior Nation

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
April 12, 2021

The Talbot Spy

The nonprofit e-newspaper for the Talbot County Community

  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Editors and Writers
    • Join our Mailing List
    • Letters to Editor Policy
    • Advertising & Underwriting
    • Code of Ethics
    • Privacy
    • Talbot Spy Terms of Use
  • Arts
  • Food & Garden
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Habitat
  • Health
  • Local Life
  • Public Affairs
  • Points of View
  • Senior Nation
News News Homepage

Early, Absentee Talbot Voters Back Tax Cap Changes

November 3, 2020 by John Griep

Share

Talbot County residents who voted by absentee ballot or during early voting supported three changes to the county’s property tax revenue cap, but rejected a measure to allow the county council to waive the residency requirement for county attorney, engineer, and planning officer.

Question A to waive the residency requirement was opposed by nearly 57 percent of early and absentee voters.

Question B corrects inaccurate language in the tax cap, approved by voters in 1996.

About 73 percent of early and absentee voters supported the charter amendment.

Question C would amend the tax cap by eliminating a reference to the Consumer Price Index-Urban (CPI-U). The existing property tax revenue cap limits the annual increase in property tax revenues to 2% or CPI-U, whichever is less.

Question C would eliminate CPI-U, which in some years has been less than 2%, further restricting the county’s ability to increase revenues to fund needed services and capital projects.

Early and absentee voters favored the amendment by 69% to 31%.

Question D would allow the county council to temporarily increase the property tax rate above the revenue cap by up to one cent per $100 of assessed value for five years only.

A one cent increase in the property tax rate would cost the owner of a home assessed at $250,000 an additional $25 annually; an additional $50 annually for the owner of a home assessed at $500,000.

Officials have pitched the one cent increase as a way for the county to catch up on lost revenue from the years when CPI-U limited the increase in revenue below 2% and as a way to help fund much-needed capital projects.

About 60% of early and absentee voters backed the temporary tax increase.


Talbot County Sheriff Joe Gamble and Emergency Services Director Clay Stamp had been leading the charge in seeking voter approval for Questions B, C, and D.

The public safety officials said the existing cap has limited the county’s ability to attract and retain deputies, paramedics, and other first responders.

Salaries and benefits for first responders are lower than in surrounding counties, the two have said, making it difficult to find new hires for open positions and leading to trained staffers leaving for better compensation packages elsewhere.

The county also needs to build a new office for the sheriff’s office and the county health department, as well as provide an additional substation for paramedics, officials have noted.

Filed Under: News Homepage Tagged With: absentee ballots, ballot questions, charter, early voting, election, property tax, Talbot County, tax cap

About John Griep

John Griep has spent more than 25 years as a reporter and editor covering Talbot County and the Mid-Shore, including county and town governments, courts, police, planning and zoning, business and real estate. Contact him at john@spycommunitymedia.org.

The Future of Waterfowl with Director Margaret Enloe Talbot Voters Back Tax Cap Changes, Keep Residency Requirement for Top Appointees

Write a Letter to the Editor on this Article

We encourage readers to offer their point of view on this article by submitting the following form. Editing is sometimes necessary and is done at the discretion of the editorial staff.

Copyright © 2021

Affiliated News

  • Spy Community Media
  • The Annapolis Spy
  • The Chestertown Spy
  • The Talbot Spy

Sections

  • Arts
  • Culture
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Mid-Shore Health
  • Local Life
  • Shore Recovery
  • Spy Senior Nation

Spy Community Media

  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Underwriting

Copyright © 2021 · Spy Community Media Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in