The annual report from the Social Security and Medicare Trustees is a sobering reckoning. It is also a warning.
According to the Trustees, the Social Security trust fund, the bedrock of American retirement security, will be insolvent by 2033. That is not a distant abstraction. That is when today’s 59-year-olds retire. And if nothing is done, retirees will receive an automatic 23 percent benefit cut under current law.
Put plainly, if this system is not fixed now, you are not going to receive what you were promised. This is not political hyperbole. It is math. And math does not lie.
The Old Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund, which pays benefits to most retirees, will be depleted in eight years. If temporary reallocation from the Disability Insurance trust fund occurs, that buys one more year, until 2034, before both are drained. At that point, every beneficiary will see a 19 percent across the board cut in benefits, growing to 28 percent by the end of the century.
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget warns, “Social Security is barreling toward insolvency. If policymakers fail to act, they will effectively be supporting a 23 percent across the board benefit cut for all retirees in just eight years.”
The scale of the imbalance is staggering.
The Trustees project 3.6 trillion dollars in cash deficits over the next decade. Over 75 years, the shortfall grows to 26 trillion dollars in today’s dollars. The actuarial deficit has nearly doubled since 2010. You cannot wish that away.
Congressional inaction has consequences. Each passing year removes more policy options from the table. In 2010, the system could have been saved with modest adjustments. Now, restoring solvency requires the equivalent of a 22 percent reduction in benefits, a 29 percent payroll tax increase, or some combination.
Wait another decade, and the pain becomes even sharper. A 34 percent tax hike. A 26 percent benefit cut. No room to phase in things gently. No time for people to prepare.
Social Security is not some discretionary social program. It is a contract between generations. Workers paid in, trusting that what they contributed would be there for them. But those promises were made without fiscal discipline. What began as a pay as you go system has been stretched by demographic realities, longer life expectancies, lower birth rates, and a shrinking ratio of workers to retirees.
The math no longer works. Today, fewer than 3 workers support each retiree. By 2035, that number falls to 2.3. Revenues have not kept pace with costs, and the shortfall widens every year. Social Security costs will rise from 14.7 percent of taxable payroll today to 17 percent by 2050, while revenues remain stagnant.
And while recent legislation like the so-called Social Security Fairness Act was passed with noble intentions, it made the problem worse. That law allows some workers to double dip between Social Security and separate state or local pensions, adding billions to the imbalance.
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget notes that “half of the deterioration in Social Security’s 75-year shortfall is due to the passage of the Social Security Fairness Act.” Another part of the shortfall is due to regulatory changes that made it easier to qualify for disability benefits and to demographic trends like lower fertility rates.
The worst lie told to the American people is the one that says reform is not necessary. That everything will be fine if we simply tax the rich or cut waste. Those slogans are political comfort food. The Trustees’ math tells a different story. You cannot solve a 26 trillion-dollar hole with bumper stickers.
Both parties are complicit. Democrats refuse to acknowledge that current benefit formulas are unsustainable. Republicans too often run from any mention of taxes. Meanwhile, the clock ticks and retirees will pay the price for Washington’s cowardice.
In truth, there are many options available. Lawmakers could gradually raise the retirement age. They could redesign benefits to better target those most in need. They could broaden the tax base or tweak the payroll cap. But they must act soon. Every year of delay means steeper cuts, higher taxes, or more abrupt changes. The window to implement thoughtful phased reforms is rapidly closing.
According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, “Delaying action until 2034 would increase the size of necessary adjustments by 15 percent. Changes to benefits for new beneficiaries alone would be insufficient to restore solvency to the program, even if benefits were eliminated entirely.”
If you are under 60, hear this clearly:
- You will not receive the benefits you were promised unless something is done now. That is not speculation. That is federal law.
- When the trust fund runs dry, benefits are cut automatically.
- Congress does not have to vote. No one has to pass a bill. It just happens.
But that fate is not inevitable. It is a choice. Policymakers can choose to act while time, flexibility, and political goodwill remain. Or they can continue to delay until a crisis forces their hand, at which point your future will be carved up by a butcher’s cleaver, not a surgeon’s scalpel.
We have a decade. Barely. The math is in. The alarm is sounding. The question is whether our elected leaders will answer it or continue to pretend that arithmetic is a partisan opinion.
If they do nothing, the trust fund will fail, and the promise of Social Security will fail with it.
You paid into the system. You earned those benefits. But unless leaders act now, you will not get what you were promised.
And that is a promise from math… and math does not lie.
Who doubts me?
Clayton A. Mitchell, Sr. is a life-long Eastern Shoreman, an attorney, and former Chairman of the Maryland Department of Labor’s Board of Appeals. He is co-host of the Gonzales/Mitchell Show podcast that discusses politics, business, and cultural issues.
Jim Moses CDR, USN (Ret.) says
If not for Grover Norquist, this could have been resolved years ago.
Matt LaMotte says
And, ipso facto, Project 2025’s fever dream will come true!
William Keppen says
Citizens United decision, by another name is the Merchant of Death.
Michael Davis says
“Policymakers can choose to act while time, flexibility, and political goodwill remain.” This will never happen. There is NO political goodwill today.
It started with Newt Gingrich. Grover Norquist, mentioned below, was also a big help. LOTS of Republicans have contributed to the complete dysfunction of Congress.
A whole book could be written about how ugly Republicans made Congress. They fired the speaker of the house for needing Democrats to vote for a bill. Johnson will not allow a vote on a bill if he needs so much as one Democrat to vote for it. When the Minnesota couple was killed, two Republicans lied about it to make political points against Democrats. Don Jr. made joked when Nancy Pelosi’s husband was almost killed. Trump refuses to call victims who are not Republicans. Trump called Democrats traitors for not standing up and giving him an applause during one state of the Union.
As for “What about….”, you won’t find nearly as many cases of Democrats acting as hostile, rude, obnoxious and downright traitorous as Republicans. Even our local B-list Republican Congressman can’t open his mouth without lying.
I don’t doubt the problem. I doubt it can be solved without a crisis.
Rick Hughes says
Well said, Michael. While the left has its own disdain for the MAGA right, with many justifiable reasons, it is nothing like the rhetoric of hatred spewed by the GOP on a daily basis that is poisoning America. The lies and the pandering to Trump makes all Republicans in Congress complicit. They should stand against Project 2025 and this criminal administration, instead their silence is deafening.
Suzanne Todd says
Thank you, Michael. If the Democrats did half of what the Republicans are doing and have done, they’d be crucified. Such a double standard.
S Keating says
If the government just paid back the money it “borrowed” from the Social Security funds we could make it work. They are just ignoring their obligation to us.
Kent Robertson says
How much better it would have been for Social Security to have mandated the same savings, but put in each individual’s private IRA!!! A small percentage could have gone to a fund for those UNABLE to work.
I wonder what percentage of 18-65 year olds are working. If they aren’t, why? Our “unemployment rates” are markedly skewed to minimize the number of people not working. The system is rife with people gaming the welfare system.
If they aren’t working because of health issues that stem from unhealthy lifestyles and diet, that should be a major priority at all levels of government. I hope RFK Jr can make the systemic changes necessary to truly make Americans healthy again. I believe (after nearly 50 years in medicine) that proper nutrition and regular exercise could save nearly 50% of what we spend on health care.
And then there’s the $37T debt that’s costing us over $1T in interest every year and driving up interest rates and inflation. We can’t balance the budget now even if we slashed EVERY dollar of discretional spending.
There is plenty of blame to go around, pointing fingers and disparaging the other side doesn’t solve anything. We need open honest debate and representatives in Congress and the White House who will have the courage to do what is necessary.
I suspect it is too late to save our economy. I suspect it will collapse in the next 5-10 years because we won’t stop this insane polarization and start working together to solve the problems. So I’m learning to grow food and try to prepare to be self-sufficient. I never imagined that I would say these things about my beloved America. I guess I’m becoming a prepper
Deirdre LaMotte says
Wow Kent. I am shocked at you declaring the old “welfare Queens” argument from the early 1980s.
People struggle and our nation is skewed to those with vast resources. When one trip to the emergency
can cause severe financial difficulties in a 1st World Nation, something is very wrong.
Love this sign from a recent protest:
Why do
Republicans
ALWAYS have money for walls, wars and jails,
But NEVER for
Veterans and Healthcare.
I would add why do we need tax cuts to Billionaires? It is obscene. And the GOP knows it.
Jim Wilkins says
Hi Clayton- Tax the rich. It’s a simple solution. There’s way more than enough money sloshing around to pay for social security and solve the debt problem if taxation were fair. But it isn’t is it? All of your long winded orations don’t make anything better or propose a solution. So why not just accept the fact that you and your Republican friends can’t stomach raising taxes on themselves to pay for these things?