MENU

Sections

  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Editors and Writers
    • Join our Mailing List
    • Letters to Editor Policy
    • Advertising & Underwriting
    • Code of Ethics
    • Privacy
    • Talbot Spy Terms of Use
  • Art and Design
  • Culture and Local Life
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
    • Senior Life
  • Community Opinion
  • Sign up for Free Subscription
  • Donate to the Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
  • Subscribe
February 10, 2026

Talbot Spy

Nonpartisan Education-based News for Talbot County Community

  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Editors and Writers
    • Join our Mailing List
    • Letters to Editor Policy
    • Advertising & Underwriting
    • Code of Ethics
    • Privacy
    • Talbot Spy Terms of Use
  • Art and Design
  • Culture and Local Life
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
    • Senior Life
  • Community Opinion
  • Sign up for Free Subscription
  • Donate to the Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy
Op-Ed

Focus On Talbot: Planning Commission To Re-Examine Lakeside Process by Dan Watson

July 19, 2021 by Dan Watson

Share

The Talbot County Planning Commission is on the way to investigating possible problems surrounding the greenlight given to the Lakeside developer last year.  Allegations have been made about inappropriate and dangerous changes to the plans for the new spray irrigation sewage system for the project, the withholding of information about failures in the existing Trappe sewer plant to which the first 120 homes (or more) are to be connected, and a breakdown in the integrity of the County’s land use review process.

It is clear a majority of Planning Commissioners are committed to get to the bottom of things if they can, to try to determine if the allegations are true or not.  The first step of that process will take place at a Commission Work Session set for this Wednesday at 2:00 p.m. at the large meeting room of the Talbot County Public Library, which will be open to the public.  No conclusions are expected at this session:  this meeting will be devoted to compiling and clarifying the questions to which the Commissioners are demanding answers.  All of this is in preparation for comments to the Maryland Department of the Environment (“MDE”) in their re-evaluation of the Lakeside discharge permit, as ordered by the Circuit Court of Talbot County.

(The Commission’s work session might be livestreamed and/or viewable afterwards here.  

The Planning Commissioner’s review was delayed because on July 2nd–within twenty-four hours of receiving a letter detailing the problems—the Commission was instructed by the Acting County Attorney not to discuss any of it:  not the developer’s post-approval changes to plans nor the apparent hiding of information about existing pollution already happening at the Trappe plant to which the first homes at to be connected.  The gag order (as it was characterized by one Commissioner) was out within twenty-four hours, after the Acting County Attorney consulted with Councilman Pack and the County Engineer.

Though the Planning Commission was most unhappy with this directive, the County Attorney did not attend their next meeting on July 7th, and indeed a session to respond to the Commissions’ objections to that order could not be scheduled until Friday.  At that encounter the Commissioners and the Acting County Attorney spent almost an hour and a half in closed executive session before Commission Chairman Chip Councell announced the upcoming work session.

The Planning Commission is also asking the County Council to provide them with independent legal counsel, so that they can get legal advice from a source other than the Acting County Attorney, who represents and responds to the Council.  (Mr. Pack suggested such an arrangement at the Council Meeting on July 13th.)

As regular readers recall, this all began two and a half months ago when I petitioned the County Council to consider rescission of Resolution 281.  The Council continues to refuse to permit me to even present the Petition, and I have had to go to the Circuit Court to seek an order to compel them to hear it–as explicitly required by their own Rules of Procedure.  Approximately 200 concerned citizens and the Talbot Preservation Alliance have formally joined in supporting Petition 21-01.  (Consider adding your name too, simply by sending a brief email to that effect to [email protected].) 

Two and a half months is a long time, and the County could have already completed a review of the matters if they’d wanted to.  Instead, the Council and their Acting County Attorney seem to have done all they could to resist and delay any re-examination of the Lakeside approvals, and they may continue to do that.  Meanwhile, the developer began pushing dirt last Thursday.

It is comforting to learn that the five Commissioners (experienced unpaid volunteers) are launching an effort to get to the bottom of things. As Chairman Councell told the County Council in a meeting last Tuesday night, “When I look in the mirror, and when I talk to my kids and grandkids in so many years, I want them to know we did everything we did in the correct order and made the best decision possible. It’s that simple.”

Dan Watson is the former chair of Bipartisan Coalition For New Council Leadership and has lived in Talbot County for the last twenty-five years. 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Academy Art Museum Announces August Events Adkins Mystery Monday: What Tree Produces this Fruit?

Letters to Editor

  1. Michael Davis says

    July 19, 2021 at 3:31 PM

    Thank you Dan for your continuing efforts to protect our environment from irresponsible developers.

  2. David Lloyd says

    July 19, 2021 at 5:49 PM

    The County Council must do what is right for the citizens and not the developers who are behind this effort. Ignoring County Council rules — not allowing a citizen to present his Petition — is, regrettably, nothing new re the Council. They have shown disregard for those they represent for some time now. Time for some changes!!

Write a Letter to the Editor on this Article

We encourage readers to offer their point of view on this article by submitting the following form. Editing is sometimes necessary and is done at the discretion of the editorial staff.

Copyright © 2026

Affiliated News

  • The Chestertown Spy
  • The Talbot Spy

Sections

  • Arts
  • Culture
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Mid-Shore Health
  • Culture and Local Life
  • Shore Recovery
  • Spy Senior Nation

Spy Community Media

  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Underwriting

Copyright © 2026 · Spy Community Media Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in