For quite a few years now, this publisher has silently stewed over reading in national publications about the crisis of “local news” coverage. The source of irritation is not the subject itself. There is, indeed, a real problem with communities, large or small, losing critically important newspapers of record at a time when news is so vital to our form of government and quality of life. I am grateful for that kind of attention to a big problem.
No, my beef is the term “local news” itself. A case in point: the nonprofit Baltimore Banner has rightly been hailed as a role model in saving “local news.” But “local” in Baltimore’s case means over 1 million people in a metro area. It’s understandable why “local” is defined that way, but it’s hard to compare that major million-dollar enterprise to the mission and scale of something like the Talbot Spy.
The Spy has always considered itself in the “hyper-local” category, a minimal subset of a major, more significant movement in large cities across the country. Tiny by circumstances and capacity, these primarily rural online publications are typically just squeaking by with writers (many of them volunteers) and low budgets.
After almost 14 years, I’ve concluded that “squeaking by” as a business model falls into the category of good enough. With the Talbot Spy realistically limited by market size and geography, this public education nonprofit will always be a bit broke.
It also will be highly dependent on the goodwill of a relatively small number of sponsors and readers who know the importance of local news and its direct impact on their community’s quality of life.
To make the Talbot Spy work every year, we have to pay those writers and editors who need to be paid for their work. It also means covering the growing costs of a high-traffic web presence, small office spaces for interviews, and other basic business costs. Or roughly some $35,000 a year.
As its publisher, I am proud of that relatively low budget number. The Talbot Spy was never built with continued growth in mind and potentially divert needed philanthropic support to our sister nonprofits with far greater needs.
And the Spy is proud that we are making it work with the active inclusion of covering the arts and culture. While several online nonprofit news organizations are doing well in covering local government, the Talbot Spy is a unique model in that it provides equal coverage of local arts and local culture.
In many ways, the goals of the current Talbot Spy are similar to the purpose of the original Chestertown Spy in 1793. In short, it’s to keep the lights on.
Three times a year, we ask our readers to help “keep the lights on” for the Talbot Spy. Whether donating $10 or $1,000, we must count on your support to keep this labor of love a vital, relevant part of the greater Talbot County community.
To donate, please go here.
Dave Wheelan
Publisher and Executive Editor
Write a Letter to the Editor on this Article
We encourage readers to offer their point of view on this article by submitting the following form. Editing is sometimes necessary and is done at the discretion of the editorial staff.