The precedent setting Lakeside at Trappe wastewater permit deserves additional public scrutiny. That’s what we hope the permit receives at an in-person hearing hosted by the Maryland Department of the Environment at 5 p.m., Thursday, Oct. 28, at the Talbot County Community Center in Easton. We urge all who are concerned about adding pollution to local waterways to speak up at the hearing.
Residents of Trappe, population 1,000, are staring down a behemoth described as one of the largest mixed-use development proposals on the East Coast. If fully built, Lakeside at Trappe (or Trappe East) would include 2,500 homes and apartments, a shopping center, and a 30-acre lake. The development could increase the local population by more than 500 percent.
To handle the human waste generated by this massive project, the developers—Rauch Inc., Trappe East Holdings Business Trust, and others—are proposing to build a new wastewater plant to treat the sewage. The treated wastewater would then be sprayed onto about 90 acres of fields near hundreds of existing and proposed homes.
If this plan worries you, we share your concern. It’s why two of our organizations—ShoreRivers and Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF)—filed lawsuits challenging the permit earlier this year.
The wastewater spray would be applied to fields next to the headwaters of Miles Creek, which drains into the Choptank River. The Choptank is already impaired due to excessive pollutants, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, which the state, environmental organizations, and local governments are working to mitigate. These pollutants fuel harmful algal blooms that cause dead zones, or areas of the Bay devoid of the dissolved oxygen necessary to sustain marine life. MDE officials, in drafting the permit, found that the proposed method of wastewater disposal for this project wouldn’t result in an increase of Choptank River pollutants.
We’re not convinced. While the developers have maintained that the wastewater will be treated to high standards before being applied to fields, the track record for facilities using spray irrigation in Maryland is dismal.
A Chesapeake Legal Alliance report found only about 25 percent of facilities with groundwater discharge permits were in full compliance when inspected. Nearly half of all such facilities on the Eastern Shore failed to meet groundwater permit conditions between fiscal year 2017 and the first half of fiscal 2020, according to the report.
Even using the best methods to soak up pollutants there’s still a risk of nitrogen and phosphorus entering groundwater and nearby waterways. If MDE approves this permit the agency must prove that the spray irrigation system won’t increase river and Bay pollutants.
This leads to the next issue. The project could set a precedent that would enable Maryland to approve large new developments without fully accounting for the pollution they generate. Currently, the state requires treated sewage discharged to waterways to not exceed nutrient pollution limits regulators set to achieve Bay restoration targets. This helps restoration officials understand the level of pollution reaching the Bay and as needed put in place methods such as tree plantings, stormwater controls, or enhanced farm management to reduce pollution elsewhere.
But at Lakeside, the state has effectively concluded that the proposed wastewater plant’s spray irrigation system won’t pollute at all. Therefore, there’s no need for new environmental mitigation practices to offset potential wastewater impacts in local waterways caused by this proposed development.
We see this as an end-run around state requirements to account for and mitigate pollution from new developments, if developments use spray irrigation to dispose of treated wastewater. The reality is that due to climate change we’re seeing more rainfall, more severe storms, and, as a result, more runoff carrying pollutants to the Chesapeake Bay. MDE must fully account for the influence of these factors when permitting the application of treated sewage to farmland.
We can’t backslide on the commitment to build responsibly in Maryland. Anyone concerned with the impacts of Lakeside at Trappe on water quality should have their voices heard at the in-person hearing at 5 p.m., Oct. 28, at the Talbot County Community Center.
- Alan Girard, Eastern Shore Director, Chesapeake Bay Foundation
- Matt Pluta, Choptank Riverkeeper, ShoreRivers
- Pat Comella, Co-Convener, League of Women Voters of the Mid-Shore
- Jay Corvan, Coordinator, Downstream Alliance
- Eileen A. Deymier, President, Talbot Preservation Alliance, Inc.
- Rob Etgen, President, Eastern Shore Land Conservancy
- Patrick Firth, President, Talbot Democratic Forum
- Julie Susman, Coordinator, Royal Oak’s Citizens for Managed Growth
jan bohn says
If one can’t be there in person, is there an on-line or write-in option for leaving an opinion?
Carol Voyles says
Comments emailed before Oct. 28 will be part of the hearing record:
[email protected]
suzette stitely says
MDE will consider written comments submitted on or before Friday, November 5, 2021 to [email protected] or to the following address:
Attn.: Mary Dela Onyemaechi, Chief, Groundwater Discharge Permits Division Maryland Department of the Environment
Water and Science Administration
1800 Washington Blvd.
Baltimore, Maryland 21230-1708
Dan Watson says
The four hundred or so citizens who formally support Petition 21-01–to rescind “without prejudice” the green light the Talbot County Council gave Lakeside in August 2020 in order to buy time for issues like this to be resolved–of course fully support the points made above. Indeed, the issue described here comprises, in its entirety, the second of FIVE distinct reasons why the County Council must reverse its earlier position, as Mr. Lesher’s Resolution 308 provides.
More information will be forthcoming when public comment resumes before the Council.
Eileen A. Deymier says
A written statement, if one is not able to attend the MDE hearing on Oct. 28th can be submitted to:
MD Dept. fo the Environment Water & Science administration Division 1800 Washington Blivd. Baltimore,MD 21230-1708 Attn. Mary Dela Onyemaechi, Groundwater Discharge Permits
OR:
EMAIL: [email protected] NO LATER THAN Novemebr 5,2021.
Jane Bollman says
All Talbot County citizens should be aware of the pending disaster if the planned waste disposal is allowed. Public protest can change the direction of plans for waste disposal.
Abby helfand says
How can we stop this proposed plan. I live in Williamsburg and everything runs down stream.