MENU

Sections

  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Editors and Writers
    • Join our Mailing List
    • Letters to Editor Policy
    • Advertising & Underwriting
    • Code of Ethics
    • Privacy
    • Talbot Spy Terms of Use
  • Art and Design
  • Culture and Local Life
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
    • Senior Life
  • Community Opinion
  • Sign up for Free Subscription
  • Donate to the Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
  • Subscribe
December 8, 2025

Talbot Spy

Nonpartisan Education-based News for Talbot County Community

  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Editors and Writers
    • Join our Mailing List
    • Letters to Editor Policy
    • Advertising & Underwriting
    • Code of Ethics
    • Privacy
    • Talbot Spy Terms of Use
  • Art and Design
  • Culture and Local Life
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
    • Senior Life
  • Community Opinion
  • Sign up for Free Subscription
  • Donate to the Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy
00 Post to Chestertown Spy 3 Top Story Point of View Hugh

Netflix Makes a Blockbuster Move for Warner Bros by Hugh Panero

December 8, 2025 by Hugh Panero Leave a Comment

Last week, Netflix announced a blockbuster deal to purchase Warner Bros., including the film studio, the HBO MAX streaming service, and HBO, for $72 billion, to solidify its already dominant position in premium streaming with an impressive 300 million subscribers worldwide.

Since its inception, Netflix has built its enormous business organically rather than through acquisitions. This deal is their first foray into a big-time, public acquisition battle. It is why their aggressive offer was such a surprise. The Netflix deal is far from done.

The Netflix offer beat out bids from Comcast Universal and David Ellison, the ultimate nepo baby son of Oracle billionaire founder Larry Ellison (3rd richest man in the world). David Ellison’s media company, Skydance, recently acquired National Amusement and Paramount for $8 billion, and needs Warner Bros. content assets to compete with the big boys – Netflix, Amazon, Apple, and Disney. Otherwise, it is a weaker player with a lot of debt, and traditional assets like CBS Network, sports entertainment, UFC, a damaged Paramount Skydance studio, a bunch of dying cable TV channels (i.e., Nickelodeon, MTV, Comedy Central), and other properties few want.

Netflix’s surprise bid has truly screwed up Ellison’s grand vision to become the newest media grand pooh-bah. The Ellisons have been kissing Trump’s ass for months to gain favor. His buttocks smooches include settling Trump’s 60 Minutes defamation lawsuit for $16 million, the firing of Stephen Colbert, and the controversial hiring of Bari Weiss to lead a more MAGA-friendly CBS News, and other assorted payoffs to disgustingly gain favor. Trump never lets a good grift opportunity pass him by, so get ready for more donations to Trump’s favorite projects.

I assume the Ellisons have reached out to Trump, urging him to get his Department of Justice (DOJ) to kill the Netflix deal. US Attorney General Pam Bondi is likely waiting for the President’s call and marching orders. Trump has several cards to play. He can direct Bondi to kill the deal, claim it is anti-competitive, and go to court to stop it and try to redirect it to Ellison. No doubt that an agreement with Ellison/Skydance has an easier regulatory path. However, Ellison may have overplayed his hand with his heavy-handed pressure campaign to get Warner Bros. CEO David Zaslav to sell the company to him.

Media outlets have reported that Ellison has boasted that he is Trump’s preferred buyer and that he should even receive a discount because that relationship ensures the deal will close. Zazlav, his Board, and his media mogul mentor, John Malone (Warner Bros. Discovery Chair Emeritus), are not people who like being bullied and are focused on getting the best price.

Trump could also direct Bondi to extract bigger concessions from Netflix to secure the deal. For example, a more sticky commitment for WB and other Netflix movies to have a theatrical release. What about a Netflix commitment to freeze monthly streaming rates for a period of time? Trump can then claim that he is doing concrete things to keep media “affordable” for consumers while kidnapping a favorite Democrat theme. This is my idea and not something being discussed in the media.

If the DOJ cannot cut a deal with Netflix, it will tell Netflix that it intends to sue to stop the deal. Netflix will then have to choose between fighting it out in court or walking away from the deal. The Netflix deal reportedly also has a $5.8 billion breakup fee to keep Warner Bros. and Netflix from getting cold fee. This battle will get dirty with various players unleashing their lobbyists, lawyers, and PR firms on regulators, shareholders and the public.

Another factor is time. It could take up to a year to litigate this matter. I have lived this experience. Warner Bros. will be frozen for a year, limiting dealmaking and risking the loss of senior executives unless they are incentivized to stick around through the process. Netflix (or anyone else) must get a deal done before 2028, when Democrats might take over, and they will definitely kill the deal.

There are many legitimate reasons to challenge the Netflix deal on antitrust grounds. The deal is for the #1 US premium streaming service (Netflix) to acquire the #3 streaming service (HBO MAX) and its vast library of movie and TV content. It will also result in the elimination a major competitor. There are also far fewer people in the US and abroad, in favor of the deal as opposed to it, which includes: movie theater owners, the Hollywood creative community, unions, and anti-big tech politicians and regulators worldwide.

According to Forbes, Netflix will argue that its real digital video competitor for consumers’ streaming attention is YouTube, which, according to Nielsen, accounts for about 13% of all streaming compared to 8% for Netflix and 1.3% for HBO MAX, although YouTube does not stream premium movie content.

Any Warner Bros. sale will likely trigger manic media acquisition activity as the boards of directors for the other media titans absorb the ramifications of the shrinking media landscape. They may decide they also need to get bigger to compete, and the purchase window is closing. For example, is Disney/ABC now in play? A clear target for Apple and others.

On a practical basis, how will the Warner Bros. sale affect you based on who the buyer is?

Winner Netflix. Warner Bros. content will be absorbed into the Netflix platform. This includes the HBO MAX streaming service, which will eventually be shut down. Warner Bros. currently makes content for other services. For example, Warner Bros. TV is involved in popular Apple TV shows Ted Lasso and Shrinking. I assume these kinds of deals will end after their current contracts expire if Netflix prevails. Netflix will not acquire Warner Bros. cable properties (CNN, TNT, and HGTV). Before a Netflix deal closes, these properties will be spun off into a separate company, Discovery Global. I would not be surprised if they are sold off.

Winner Ellison/Skydance: Warner content will be absorbed into their Paramount+ streaming service. The name will likely change, since Warner Bros. and HBO are stronger brands than Paramount+, and the newly bulked-up streaming service name might need to reflect that. The cable properties will be absorbed and added to its existing portfolio of underperforming cable assets caused by cord-cutting. CNN would likely report to Bari Weiss, who runs CBS News operations, and undergo a painful purge and MAGAfication to appease Trump further. So long, Jake, Anderson, etc.

Winner Comcast Universal: You will see a similar dynamic. Warner Bros. content would be integrated into the Universal Peacock streaming brand, recently bolstered by a 5-year, $1 billion deal between NBC Universal and Taylor Sheridan, the red-hot creator of Yellowstone and Tulsa King, whom they recently poached from Paramount. Comcast also plans to spin off its struggling cable properties, especially liberal MSNow (formerly MSNBC), which Trump hates; the goal is to isolate and protect its valuable Trump-regulated core assets like NBC and its TV stations from potential Trump retaliation.

In all these scenarios, expect big layoffs and monthly streaming rates to rise a year after a deal closes.

UPDATE: This morning, David Ellison’s company launched an all-cash hostile tender offer for $30 per share for all of Warner Bros., above Netflix’s $27.75 share bid — Stay tuned!

Hugh Panero, a tech and media entrepreneur, was the founder and former CEO of XM Satellite Radio. He has worked with leading tech venture capital firms and was an adjunct media professor at George Washington University. He writes about Tech, Media, and other stuff for the Spy.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 00 Post to Chestertown Spy, 3 Top Story, Hugh

The Righting Life By Laura J. Oliver

December 7, 2025 by Laura J. Oliver Leave a Comment

Confession time. As a creative writing instructor, I’m super selective about the examples I use to demonstrate craft. If I’m going to share an excerpt from another writer’s work, it can’t just be technically correct; it must make the group laugh out loud, or choke up, or sit in stunned silence while they regain their composure because the resonant ending has left them unable to speak. 

Okay, I’m describing me, but I hope I’m eliciting a similar reaction in my students. 

Which is why I was surprised a couple of weeks ago when, at the end of a story numerous workshops have found moving, one participant raised his hand and said, “I hate this story. It’s overwritten, ridiculous, and manipulative. I don’t know if this writer is a beginner or what, but it shows.”

Everyone else suddenly looked expressionless, like 30 small businesses had just closed. 

I have learned that in any group, there is likely to be a contrarian. Someone who begs to differ, who needs to disagree, just to disagree. It’s human nature. 

And I’m smiling at the one of you muttering, “No, it’s not.”

But I thought I would sound defensive if I mentioned that the writer of the sample piece had published 19 novels, 150 short stories, a multitude of them in The New Yorker, and had also won the Pen Faulkner award for Excellence in Literature. 

Twice. 

So, I asked more about the objector’s objections, and I could agree to a point. I’ve never read anything I wouldn’t have edited a little differently and said so, respectfully acquiescing to some of his criticisms. But the guy wouldn’t let it go, and I started to think, Okaaay, you are becoming a little hard to love, mister. Still, I wanted to listen more than to explain, and I recognize that “Because I said so” is an immature response in any context. 

But is it? 

I’m sharing this because everything I have learned about writing is true of life. 

Take vulnerability. In most workshops, you give everyone a copy of the story you have birthed with great effort, then listen in enforced silence as the group discusses it. The theory is you need to really absorb the criticism—not be distracted by defending the work.

It’s super fun, like being gagged and tied up while strangers abscond with your baby. 

But in a good workshop, your baby is nurtured by intelligent people who recognize her charms and offer insightful suggestions that improve her chances of survival. The instructor protects you from well-meaning participants who tend to point at you while they speak. In a great workshop, you learn that you can cut the whole first page and enter the story on fire. This kind of feedback makes you grateful you live in a democracy—groups are smart. 

But groups, like life, can also be full of overworked, tired people and one or two cranks, and the instructor may not keep people from addressing you directly, people to whom, by the rules of engagement, you are not allowed to respond. 

And in truly bad workshops, no one bothers to point out what is working in your story because they assume you already know all the good stuff, so they just get right down to pointing out all the places your story fails, like this is a moral obligation.  

Some of us have friends like this. Some of us may be friends like this. Writing and life. I keep telling you. Same-same. 

I have not tried this, but I have a theory: if you did nothing but read a story and praise what works, the writer would gradually improve through praise alone. And your kids might, and your spouse might—might get braver, take more chances, and, in feeling safe, be funnier, more insightful, and inspired. Impulsively hug you tight. Spontaneously reach for your hand in a parking lot.

My friend Margaret attended a writing retreat like this. The teacher’s instructions were simple: “Each day we’ll write stories from the heart, read them aloud, and tell each other what we love about them. No criticism and no suggestions allowed.” Margaret was a bit disappointed. With those limitations, she figured she’d just paid for a week’s change of scene, but that her writing would not improve. 

But she said later, “I was wrong about that. I learned I can write from the heart, hear good things about that effort, and be forever changed.” By nothing more than the reinforcement of the good! “I began to find my voice,” she continued. “They called me ‘a weaver,’ and they called me that again and again.” 

For some reason, I was deeply moved by this. Something about the word “weaver,” I think. About being seen over and over, which implies being witnessed by someone who stayed. 

I once had a dream in which I inexplicably and repeatedly heard the word “Rabbi”. I’m not Jewish, but I’ve learned to embrace what seems to come from nowhere. So, I explored the meaning, which in Hebrew is “teacher.” And I felt called somehow. Loved somehow. And moved by this as well. 

Years later, someone called me a healer, and it had the same effect. A stunned, “Really?” Followed by a sense of having been called by name.

Read me your story and I will tell you everything I love about it. Will you be changed?

My guess is yes. 

Writing and life. Same/same.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 00 Post to Chestertown Spy, 1 Homepage Slider, Laura

Maryland Caucus with Len Foxwell and Clayton Mitchell: The Worrisome Case of Kelly Madigan

December 5, 2025 by Len Foxwell and Clayton Mitchell Leave a Comment

Every Wednesday, but this week on Friday,  Maryland political analysts Len Foxwell and Clayton Mitchell discuss the politics and personalities of the state and region.

This week, Len and Clayton discuss the resignation of Kelly Madigan, Baltimore County’s first inspector general, who suggested that county leaders limited her independence. They also share their hot takes for the week.

This video is approximately 20 minutes in length.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 00 Post to Chestertown Spy, Maryland Caucus, Spy Highlights

From & Fuller: Unpacking Trump’s Attacks on Alleged Venezuelan Drug Boats

December 4, 2025 by Al From and Craig Fuller Leave a Comment

Every Thursday, The Spy hosts a conversation with Al From and Craig Fuller on the most topical political news of the moment. 

This week, From and Fuller discuss the Trump administration’s military strikes on vessels near Venezuela that Trump and senior officials claim are smuggling narcotics.

Kat Engst is guest-hosting this week while Dave Wheelan is on assignment.

This video podcast is approximately twenty-one minutes in length.

Background

While the Spy’s public affairs mission has always been hyper-local, it has never limited us from covering national, or even international issues, that impact the communities we serve. With that in mind, we were delighted that Al From and Craig Fuller, both highly respected Washington insiders, have agreed to a new Spy video project called “The Analysis of From and Fuller” over the next year.

The Spy and our region are very lucky to have such an accomplished duo volunteer for this experiment. While one is a devoted Democrat and the other a lifetime Republican, both had long careers that sought out the middle ground of the American political spectrum.

Al From, the genius behind the Democratic Leadership Council’s moderate agenda which would eventually lead to the election of Bill Clinton, has never compromised from this middle-of-the-road philosophy. This did not go unnoticed in a party that was moving quickly to the left in the 1980s. Including progressive Howard Dean saying that From’s DLC was the Republican wing of the Democratic Party.

From’s boss, Bill Clinton, had a different perspective. He said it would be hard to think of a single American citizen who, as a private citizen, has had a more positive impact on the progress of American life in the last 25 years than Al From.”

Al now lives in Annapolis and spends his semi-retirement as a board member of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University (his alma mater) and authoring New Democrats and the Return to Power. He also is an adjunct faculty member at Johns Hopkins’ Krieger School and recently agreed to serve on the Annapolis Spy’s Board of Visitors. He is the author of “New Democrats and the Return to Power.”

For Craig Fuller, his moderation in the Republican party was a rare phenomenon. With deep roots in California’s GOP culture of centralism, Fuller, starting with a long history with Ronald Reagan, leading to his appointment as Reagan’s cabinet secretary at the White House, and later as George Bush’s chief-of-staff and presidential campaign manager was known for his instincts to find the middle ground. Even more noted was his reputation of being a nice guy in Washington, a rare characteristic for a successful tenure in the White House.

Craig has called Easton his permanent home for the last eight years, where he now chairs the board of the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum and is a former board member of the Academy Art Museum and Benedictine. He also serves on the Spy’s Board of Visitors and writes an e-newsletter available by clicking on DECADE SEVEN.

With their rich experience and long history of friendship, now joined by their love of the Chesapeake Bay, they have agreed through the magic of Zoom, to talk inside politics and policy with the Spy every Thursday.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 00 Post to Chestertown Spy, From and Fuller, Spy Highlights

America Divided By Angela Rieck

December 4, 2025 by Angela Rieck 5 Comments

I watched the Ken Burns series, The American Revolution. It is his usual outstanding and comprehensive documentary film. The American Revolution is 12 hours long (six 2-hour segments) and provides us with an intimate view of Revolutionary times. 

It is not an understatement to state that this was one of the most important revolutions in history. America’s Democracy has been successful for almost 250 years and spawned revolutions throughout the world. The Declaration of Independence often served as the framework.

Most of us think of the Revolution as a time when Americans united to create the great experiment, Democracy, home rule by the people. We were taught that Americans rose up en-masse to create a government that allowed for independence, equal representation, and religious freedom for all. But the documentary makes clear that the American Revolution was actually a civil war. Americans who wanted to remain under British rule (called Tories) fought against those who wanted self-government (Patriots). Other Americans excluded from the democracy fought against the Patriots.

This was freedom for white men only, with a preference for educated property owners. The American Revolution excluded enslaved people, native Americans, and women, thereby encouraging indigenous and enslaved people to fight with the British. There were columns of soldiers with enslaved people, native Americans, and Tories that battled the Patriots.

In the Dunmore Act in 1775, enslaved men were offered freedom if they fought for the crown. Understandably, most of the enslaved population who fought in the Revolutionary War battled on the British side.

Most Native Americans, seeing how Patriots were usurping their land, sided with the British, who guaranteed their lands outside of the current colonies.

Women were never even considered, despite Abigail Adams’ pleas. They courageously followed their husbands in the war. Women tended to the wounded, buried the dead, cooked the meals, cared for the children, and in some instances, actually participated in the fighting.

It took centuries to include those who were excluded in our Democracy. The repercussions to indigenous people, women, and enslaved people are felt today.

But the point remains the same, we talk about how fractious and dangerous America is now (in fact, one Trump supporter has a sign that reads “All Hail King Trump”). It is important to remember that America has often been divided and fractious. It is the nature of a Democracy that gives representation to all, regardless of property or education. But, when speaking up and taking a stand, the country has usually pointed to independence, freedom, separation of church and state, and government by the majority.

It keeps me hopeful.


Angela Rieck, a Caroline County native, received her PhD in Mathematical Psychology from the University of Maryland and worked as a scientist at Bell Labs, and other high-tech companies in New Jersey before retiring as a corporate executive. Angela and her dogs divide their time between St Michaels and Key West Florida. Her daughter lives and works in New York City.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 00 Post to Chestertown Spy, 3 Top Story, Angela

Will Humans Become History’s Losers? By Al Sikes

December 3, 2025 by Al Sikes Leave a Comment

Is intuition obsolete? What about our accumulated layers of information and feelings or what we might call seasoning? Including, of course, the lessons from failures and the information-laden seams of character? Or, the fruits of relationships—the improvisational values of collaboration?

It was 1959. One of the greatest jazz pieces ever composed, “Take Five”, was performed by the Dave Brubeck Quartet. The melody was written by Paul Desmond, but the band collaborated on the final fusion of ideas and musical notes. Brubeck created the harmonic foundation and Joe Morello the famous drum pattern.

“Take Five” is both Desmond’s composition and a Brubeck Quartet creation. A collaboration for the ages.

Are the coders with their artificial intelligence (AI) tools going to upstage fertile minds? Minds shaped and reshaped by life? Can they turn the generative algorithms  into 21st-century creators without pirating previous works? Can AI models take humans out of the equation?

At the risk of mixing up input and outcomes, here are some recent experiences—the complex and simple kind. When I got my knees replaced, I offhandedly referred to the surgery as robotic chainsawing. Thank goodness for the strides in pain management. My research and subsequent experience suggest that doctors working with robotic tools are a generation or two more effective in the removal of the old and integrating the new.

But then how much do we want tools to get in the middle? For example, in a recent trip back from New York, I came face-to-face with both a person and a screen at the same service area on the New Jersey Turnpike. As required by New Jersey law, a human pumped gas and cleaned the car window while my wife had to figure out the tablet interface at a ShakeShack. Best in show: the gas attendant, not the interface,

Whether we are dealing with a medical breakthrough or ordering sandwiches, humans can be either crucial or welcome. I am afraid that when they are just welcome they will disappear. Too bad, variations on the default format go missing, and hospitality is nonexistent.

As one friend of mine often quips, “Here’s the thing.” I started with a slide rule, welcomed the electronic spreadsheet, and then the calculator, followed quickly by the computerization of most things.

Technology attracts investment. And, return on investment will require volume—a robust demand side. The capital investment in AI is without precedent and that will help to assure the ultimate flipped script. Will we flip from humanics to mechanics? If so what will be lost, a civilization?

A recent headline in the Wall Street Journal proclaimed “The College Students Who Can’t Do Elementary Math.” The underlying story verified that many students at the University of California, San Diego can’t round numbers or add fractions. If you cannot tally up numbers, trouble will follow.

Regardless, as momentum flips the script, the depth of human creativity will remain crucial to progress and humanity. But, if AI becomes a substitute for thinking, the incurious will need to muscle up.

Al Sikes is the former Chair of the Federal Communications Commission under George H.W. Bush. Al writes on themes from his book, Culture Leads Leaders Follow published by Koehler Books. 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, 00 Post to Chestertown Spy, Al

The Hegseth “Kill Them All” Order is Trump’s—and America’s—Nightmare By J.E. Dean

December 3, 2025 by J.E. Dean 10 Comments

Just as the Epstein scandal was temporarily disappearing from the daily news, The Washington Post reported a more horrific story. Self-dubbed Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is reported to have ordered a second strike on an already-destroyed suspected drug smuggling boat to kill two survivors. If the story is accurate, the United States may have committed a war crime.

Those of us familiar with the history of the Vietnam War will remember the Mai Lai Massacre, where between 347 and 504 unarmed Vietnamese adults and children were killed. The Hegseth incident is, of course, much smaller, but the legal issue is the same. An illegal order was given resulting in unarmed people being killed.

Much is being written about who gave what order. Donald Trump, unsurprisingly, says he knew nothing about it and that Pete Hegseth denies giving the order. No surprises here, but if Trump and Hegseth are lying, it may not protect them from accountability. The bipartisan leadership of both the House and Senate Armed Services Committees have announced investigations. 

A phrase featured on The X-Files television series comes to mind: The truth is out there.

Legal pundits are pouring over details of the attack that killed the two survivors. The issues are complex, but, assuming that the account is true, the answer is simple: Murder.

Among the issues involved is the legitimacy of characterizing Venezuelan boats suspected of smuggling dangerous narcotics as an attack on the United States. Another issue is why; after releasing video footage of the first attack on the suspected drug boat, the Department of Defense did not release the second or report that a second strike had been carried out. Was there a coverup? If there was a coverup, does that prove that whoever ordered it knew an illegal order had been given and executed?

Also, if Hegseth did not give the order, who did? And are Hegseth, Trump, or others responsible or was someone else insubordinate? Is someone going to be thrown under the bus? (As of this writing, the betting is on US Special Operations Command commander Admiral Frank “Mitch” Bradley.) 

I won’t review the Law of War or the U.S. Code of Military Justice, but the law is clear that killing civilians who pose no threat to U.S. military members, even in a war zone, is murder. Read 18 U.S.C. § 2441-War Crimes and judge for yourself.

In coming weeks, articles of Impeachment will likely be filed in the U.S. House of Representatives against President Trump, Secretary Hegseth, and others. The coming House and Senate Committee investigations, which the President is unlikely to be able to stop, could not only assign responsibility for what appears to be a horrific war crime, but also document a coverup likely to put Watergate to shame.

When I started work on this week’s column, I was going to write about accountability and the absence of it in the age of Trump. If the Post reporting is accurate, and many in Congress, including Republicans, believe it is, accountability may finally come to Donald J. Trump.


J.E. Dean writes on politics, government, goldendoodles, and other subjects. A former counsel on Capitol Hill and public affairs consultant, Dean is an advocate for democracy and the rule of law.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: J.E. Dean, 00 Post to Chestertown Spy, 3 Top Story

Why Can’t We All Get Along Anymore? By Maria Grant

December 2, 2025 by Maria Grant 4 Comments

During the holiday season, when I’m particularly thankful for family and friends, I sometimes reflect on how many family members, friends, colleagues, and former couples no longer speak to one another. It seems as though it’s getting more difficult for us to get along. Or maybe it’s always been that way. Or maybe the world is simply less forgiving, crueler, crasser, and less kind.

Consider just a few of the “celebrity” relationships that have somehow dissolved: Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban, Ben and Jerry, Dennis and Randy Quaid, Simon and Garfunkel, Hall and Oates, Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom, Macaulay Culkin and his dad, Meghan Markle and her dad, Brooke Shields and her mom; Donald Trump and Marjorie Taylor Greene, Mike Pence, Bill Barr, James Mattis, General Mark Milley, Chris Christie, Michael Cohen, H.R. McMaster, Omarosa, Anthony Scaramucci. (I could keep going.) 

Such rifts can be caused by incompatible values, jealousy, and lack of respect. Friendships can end because two people no longer share core values. Co-workers may have professional rivalries that lead to tensions and avoidance. Business partners relationships may sour over the direction of the company, politics, or personal conduct. 

Research suggests there are top 10 reasons marriages break up: Family (not being able to get along with the spouse’s family); lack of communication; stress; technology (not unplugging from it); selfishness; inability to forgive; loose boundaries; the past (not getting past it); dishonesty; and pride. 

Dr Gottman of the Gottman Institute identified four key behaviors which he labeled the four horsemen that indicate a relationship is in trouble: Criticism, contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling. (I remember a therapist friend once told me that when she is doing couples therapy and senses contempt from one of the partners, she knows the relationship is doomed.)

Some friends have shared that they have broken off relationships because of substance abuse issues, cheating, boredom, financial issues, or just plain apathy. 

So, what’s the secret to getting along? Experts say it’s a combination of empathy and respect achieved through active listening, open-mindedness, and effective communication. Key practices include seeking to understand others, finding common ground, and showing general appreciation. 

Here are a few quotes that emphasize why getting along is worth the effort.

“The most important single ingredient in the formula of success is knowing how to get along with people.” Theodore Roosevelt

“Without friends, no one would choose to live, though he had all other goods.” Aristotle

“A day without a friend is like a pot without a single drop of honey left inside.” A. A. Milne Winnie-the-Pooh

“The longer I live, the more deeply I learn that love—whether we call it friendship or family or romance—is the work of mirroring and magnifying each other’s light.” James Baldwin

Something to think about. 


Maria Grant, a former principal-in-charge of the federal human capital practice of an international consulting firm, now focuses on writing, reading, music, bicycling, and nature.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Maria, 00 Post to Chestertown Spy, 3 Top Story

My Newest Word By Jamie Kirkpatrick

December 2, 2025 by Jamie Kirkpatrick 1 Comment

I love words! If I were King Midas, I would turn all the world’s words to gold. If I were a miser, I would horde every word in the dictionary. If I were an architect, I would build skyscrapers out of words. If I were Warren Buffett, I would invest in words and make millions. And if I were Johnny Appleseed, I would plant words and watch fragrant orchards grow. But I’m just a writer so I celebrate words; they are the precious coins of my realm.

I make it a point to do three or four crossword puzzles every day. My wife thinks I’m just fooling around, but I believe crossword puzzles keep my mind sharp, but every once in a while, I trip over a new word. When that happens, I feel like I’ve run a marathon—giddy, energized, sky-high on endorphins. OK, so I’m a word nerd and proud of it!

Case in point: yesterday, I discovered my newest word—“echt.” It essentially means “authentic.” Apparently, we have George Bernard Shaw to thank for bringing “echt” to America. He used the word in an article he wrote in 1916, and it has been around ever since. As the current saying goes, I appreciate you, GBS!

“Echt” has it etymologic roots in both German and Yiddish. That’s hardly surprising since both languages share the same Middle German source. In both languages, the word is spelled “ekht,” but it still means “true to form.” As German words go, “ekht” is a lot easier to say than “kraftfahrzeughaftpflichtversicherung” (motor vehicle liability insurance), “streichholzschachtel (box of matches), or even one of my personal favorite words, “eichhörnchen!” (Squirrel!). Infatuated as I am with words, I don’t plan on using any of those words anytime soon, but “echt” in English has staying power. It’s true-blue, the genuine article, the Real McCoy. Literally!

Once I’ve discovered a new word, I can’t wait to pop it into speech or incorporate it into my writing as soon as I can. A new word weighs in my pocket like a gold coin waiting to be spent and I don’t want to disappoint it. I look for opportunities to drop the word into conversation. For example, “My friend Allen hails from New Orleans and he sure knows how to make some echt gumbo!” Or this: “Trump doesn’t have an echt bone in his body—no true north, no underlying principles, no overarching philosophy. He’s just an erratic, impulsive brat.” That’s true enough, but “echt” just makes it so much more true. 

Now that we’ve entered the territory of December, I’ll be looking for more timely occasions to drop my new favorite word into the conversation. Please don’t judge me. It’s just that one of my missions in life is to up the English-speaking world’s vocabulary, and there’s no better time than the holidays to introduce friends and family to a new word or two. So, in that spirit, I hope you all had an echt Thanksgiving, and that the days ahead will be filled with all manner of echt cheer and joy.

I’ll be right back.


Jamie Kirkpatrick is a writer and photographer who lives on both sides of the Chesapeake Bay. His editorials and reviews have appeared in the Washington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Philadelphia Inquirer, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the Washington College Alumni Magazine, and American Cowboy Magazine. His most recent novel, “The Tales of Bismuth; Dispatches from Palestine, 1945-1948” explores the origins of the Arab-Israeli conflict. It is available on Amazon and in local bookstores. His newest novel, “The People Game,” hits the market in February, 2026. His website is musingjamie.net.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Jamie, 00 Post to Chestertown Spy, 3 Top Story

Crossing to Safety By Laura J. Oliver

November 30, 2025 by Laura J. Oliver 2 Comments

Our brain’s predilection for storytelling may be why, even now, every time I cross the Bay Bridge, that 4.4-mile-long arc spanning the Chesapeake, I imagine my car breaking through the safety rails, going over the side, or the pavement giving way beneath my tires. 

When the kids were little, they would voice their own ideas about surviving a plunge from the bridge and speak loudly of the brave and clever things they would do to save themselves.

My son, at age five, would escape from the car as it sank and hang onto floating debris—although he mulls over for quite a while whether he would hang onto a dead shark if it were the only thing available. 

My daughter, eight, would float on her back when tired and do the sidestroke to the nearest beach. There, she would build a small fire and arrange shells in pretty patterns. 

I remained quiet as they played this game, intent on formulating my own plan—a strategy similar to my daughter’s, amended by swimming with two awkward burdens. 

It was a silly exercise, but we seemed compelled to do it, and I found myself pinioned in the grip of my own imagination on each crossing. Could I break the windows as we sank? Get seatbelts unbuckled in time? And it was always my heart that broke instead, knowing I could not save us all. 

My son discards his shark dilemma and thinks he will meet the water in a perfect dive. But sometimes we fall too hard to be rescued, which is why I still seek a contingency plan.

It was a sweltering, humid July afternoon, and friends and I were swimming off the Magothy River’s north shore near two small landmasses —Dutch Ship Island and a smaller island, nearer to shore, we called Little Dutch. We could swim to Little Dutch, but usually skied around it instead, as it was privately owned, and we were intimidated by the fact that there was a house on it. 

This particular afternoon, we decided to ski. I can’t say for sure who was driving the Whaler, but the older, better skiers went first, kids 15, 16, and a couple of grades ahead. After refueling at Gray’s Creek, it was my turn to give it a try. 

I rose from the water on my second attempt, having only learned to ski that summer and the Whaler swung wide, out toward the island. The air that had been so oppressive on the beach was soft and sweet on the water, an offshore breeze that carried with it the smell of honeysuckle at its peak and the pungent counterpart of dried seaweed lacing the shore. I was aware of every detail: the towrope in my hands, the drone of the motor, the cliffs of Big Dutch, where shadows moved in the underbrush. 

We had circled the island once when the driver of the boat motioned toward the beach. It was clear he wanted to change course. Nervous, I knew I would have to cross the wake if he turned. He gestured again, and I suddenly saw myself as I must appear to my friends, inexpertly trailing the boat, a boring and inexpert 14-year-old. At that exact moment, the Whaler entered a tight turn.

My skis bumped over the first two ripples of wake streaming back from the stern without incident, but I was skimming over the water sideways much faster than when I had been directly behind the boat. Glancing down, I saw the river beneath my skis had become the blur of solid pavement, and I was accelerating way beyond my ability to stay upright. Doomed by my own panic, falling was as inevitable as the compulsion to touch a knife, to test the sharpness of the blade.

It was a spectacular fall, even witnessed from the beach. I slammed into the water so hard my body bounced off without breaking the surface several times, carried forward by unstoppable momentum. I knew I was hurt, but the ski belt kept me afloat in the murky river water until I was picked up, and it was several days before I saw a doctor. My injuries were minor by medical standards, healing in a few weeks, but it cost me a week in Ocean City with my best friend. 

Now, when I cross the bridge untested, I look back and see the high cliffs of Dutch Ship where the river meets the bay before the suspension cables fade like Camelot in the haze behind me. The cars streaming over it, briefly visible in the back window, look like the die-cast matchbox variety I tossed into the toybox in the years I made myself prepare for the worst possible loss. In the years I believed in contingency plans.

No one is dependent on me now. I take quick glimpses at the massive, sparkling expanse beneath me. At the I glory, the immensity of all that water and all that sky. At the grandeur that whispers surely there is something more.

I decide that just for today, I will trust that if the bridge ever collapses, I will be caught, carried, and delivered safely to the opposite shore. 


Laura J. Oliver is an award-winning developmental book editor and writing coach, who has taught writing at the University of Maryland and St. John’s College. She is the author of The Story Within (Penguin Random House). Co-creator of The Writing Intensive at St. John’s College, she is the recipient of a Maryland State Arts Council Individual Artist Award in Fiction, an Anne Arundel County Arts Council Literary Arts Award winner, a two-time Glimmer Train Short Fiction finalist, and her work has been nominated for a Pushcart Prize. Her website can be found here.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Laura, 00 Post to Chestertown Spy, 1 Homepage Slider

Next Page »

Copyright © 2025

Affiliated News

  • The Chestertown Spy
  • The Talbot Spy

Sections

  • Arts
  • Culture
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Mid-Shore Health
  • Culture and Local Life
  • Shore Recovery
  • Spy Senior Nation

Spy Community Media

  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Underwriting

Copyright © 2025 · Spy Community Media Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in