It is hard to overstate how much today’s cultural milieu and Donald J. Trump have changed American politics.
The image of those who seek the top office has always been important. Without parsing ancient polls, I am sure Dwight Eisenhower’s image as WWII’s top General helped him when he ran for the Presidency in 1952. Both political parties competed to entice him to be their nominee.
John F. Kennedy, who followed Eisenhower, was a poster man for the top office. Handsome, energetic, young father, beautiful wife—well you recall the profile. And I can’t leave out the Republican Hollywood actor, Ronald Reagan.
Today one Party seems to understand image while the other struggles with it. Importantly, we live in an era of performance art like none other.
We are pummeled with images from awakening to bedtime. The best marketers understand its importance and pay millions to attach dynamic images to their products and services. Indeed sports at the amateur level have been transformed by what is called NIL—name, image and likeness. What we used to call student athletes are now in part image athletes who in the top conferences get paid a lot of money. But, of course, in sports how you play the game either enhances or degrades your NIL value. A bad game hurts as does a bad debate; you can explain them, but you cannot cancel the image.
The Republicans have just nominated a person who has overcome stories about infidelity, unethical business practices and felony convictions in a New York City court because of his carefully shaped image. You will recall NBC telecast “The Apprentice” featuring Donald Trump for 14 seasons; he was characterized as the person who knew business talent. When he decided a contestant hadn’t measured up, he would say “You’re Fired!” Trump also named all of his hotels and other businesses after himself, as in “Trump Towers.” He exuded energy and success. He preened as an anti-politician. Apparently the majority of people overlook his extreme boastfulness as they generally have a bad impression of politicians.
In the meantime, Joe Biden’s image has been sliding for the last few years. First elected to the US Senate as a handsome, energetic, man-of-the- people, in recent times he has increasingly looked and sounded like age has become an essential feature and not a helpful one. He also faces the daunting task of playing defense as the images of our withdrawal from Afghanistan bite.
When people size up his sidekick, Vice-President Kamala Harris, they often see an officeholder who has struggled to express herself as the lights shone on her became progressively more intense. The intensity was amplified because President Biden put Harris in charge of the Southern border.
Trump, understanding the importance of contrast, chose his sidekick out of central casting. JD Vance is young, ruggedly handsome with the modern male inclination to have a beard. He is married to an attractive Indian-American, served in Iraq as a Marine and vaulted himself into national prominence some time ago with an autobiographical assessment of hollowed out American rural and urban landscapes. In short, his beginning in life included a dysfunctional family, widespread drug use and where he lived, rapidly declining job opportunities. While privileged politicians talk about joblessness and homelessness, Vance can spin his own stories, not somebody else’s.
The contrast is deafening. As I write, there is a revolt in the Democrat party as Biden tries to hang on and Democrat leaders and voters are mostly pushing in the other direction. Biden should be in the take-a-bow moment working on his autobiography and library. But, back to the cultural moment.
The ambitious need to understand: you can be brilliant, an exceptional student at an Ivy League institution, but if you don’t have the “It” then your electoral politics are unlikely to pay off. “It” is an image of success with more to come. On the upswing not the downswing.
I hope Democrats will nominate a ticket that can gain attention for its dynamism and skillful advocacy of its platform. America suffers when image politics undermines logic or practical wisdom. We need a contest of policy ideas and plans this fall, not a face-off determined by the best package of “name, likeness, and image.”
Al Sikes is the former Chair of the Federal Communications Commission under George H.W. Bush. Al writes on themes from his book, Culture Leads Leaders Follow published by Koehler Books.
Kent Robertson says
Mr Sikes just doesn’t “get” that a large number of conservatives and moderates don’t like President Trump’s brash rhetoric, but LOVE his policies. For liberals and the mainstream media, it IS all about his image. I wish that Mr Sikes (maybe through the Spy) would sponsor a real discussion of the differences between Trump and Biden policies. Heck, I wish ANYONE in the media would have an honest, unbiased conversation about policy. I wish there were truly unbiased sites where fact checking could be relied upon. Alas, I doubt I will see that in my lifetime.
Deirdre LaMotte says
I believe that the group that “love his policies” are the most vile: those with means who can buy their way out of anything (abortion? No problem, they can still get one; no medicaid or Social Security? They don’t need either)because they only like his tax cuts for the poor billionaires that need it, right?!
However, with regard to the “small set of low-information voters” perhaps a better term would be “media-contaminated voters.” They have lots of “information” – most of it the result of partisan hysteria, exaggerations, media spin, rumors, bold-faced lies, conspiracy theories, and culture war hyperbole. This is especially true of social media. They love the bombast because it makes them feel big, apart of something. Poor rubes….
William Keppen says
I regret the fact that we as Americans are soon very likely going to have to choose between Joe Biden and Donald Trump as the person who will be elected to be the president of the United States for the upcoming four years. One appears to be in such a state of physical decline that he may not be able to meet the many demands of the office, the other appears to lack the basic moral principles that such a position calls for, if not demands. I would not wish an untimely demise on either one, but my fondest wish would be that they both would ride off into the sunset, before the election, and grant the American people the opportunity to choose between some other two candidates.
Al Sikes says
Please take another look at the concluding paragraph. Elections should be preceded by idea competition.
Paul Rybon says
Mr. Sikes should look at Donald Trump’s acceptance speech again. Non-stop policy proposals at the end.