There are less than 100 days before the 2014 off-year congressional elections. There are elections for the entire House of Representatives and one-third of the Senate. This election comes at an extremely critical time in the history of this country and, indeed, the world.
It would appear that after the record of the present administration, there is a need for change in Washington. Change can only happen this fall with a change in the control of the U.S. Senate and some change in the way the Senate functions. The late Senator Robert C. Byrd, the longest serving senator in the Senate, said, “[The Senate’s] purpose was and is to examine, consider, protect, and to be a totally independent source of wisdom and judgment on the actions of the lower house and on the executive.” Senator Byrd was right and reflected the intentions of the nation’s founders.
Unfortunately, these words uttered by Senator Byrd not too long ago become antiquated and, for too many members of the current Senate, forgotten. With critical matters both foreign and domestic nipping at the heels of American government in all parts of the globe, the United States Senate especially needs to change. A change which could come with the elections this fall. The Senate is the house of the Congress most likely to change leadership, with the Republicans continuing to control the House of Representatives.
A change in control of the Senate would herald the fall of the obstructionist Senator Harry Reid as Senate Majority Leader. This would eliminate the ability of chief apologist for the President to control the flow of legislation in the Senate.
It also might reduce the waste of time and resources Senator Reid has expended in the weighty issue of changing the name of the NFL team, the Washington Redskins. Let us hope that the Senate will pay more attention to Ukraine, Syria and Gaza.
A strong, effective Senate could perhaps help close some of the divides that have materialized in the United States and may even tear apart the fabric of democracy.
The use of the ballot box this fall is a much more realistic way to secure and initiate change in our government than initiating efforts to impeach the President. This effort would only exacerbate internal divides and perhaps derail the will of the people in participating in the free and democratic election process.
The change of even a few seats in the Senate would produce a profound and significant change in our nation’s capitol. In addition to the elimination of Harry Reid as Senate Majority Leader, the White House would be forced to operate as a lame duck administration, with the failure of new unrealistic and unworkable initiatives being foisted on the American public
Yes, this year’s national elections are important. Perhaps as important as those elections held in the 1860’s in the Civil War era, the 1940’s and the World War II era elections, and the 1920’s and 30’s, with the events leading to U.S. participation in WW I, “the war to end all wars.”
Today, the fight against terrorism and Islamic extremism challenges the nature and threat of issues affecting a myriad of serious legislative issues. Perhaps it is time to make a change through the use of the ballot box. Without change, there can be no progress.
Write a Letter to the Editor on this Article
We encourage readers to offer their point of view on this article by submitting the following form. Editing is sometimes necessary and is done at the discretion of the editorial staff.