The old saying, “Too many cooks spoil the broth,” may well apply to the number of candidates and potential candidates for the Republican nomination for President in 2016.
The only announced candidate is Senator Ted Cruz of Texas. There is a large cast of characters waiting in the wings who are, as of now, unannounced. After eight years of the current administration, Republicans are most desirous of capturing the White House in 2016, but it is questionable if this deluge of candidates will be helpful and healthy for the GOP.
With the presidential primary season just beginning to become active, the Democrats appear to have already settled on former First Lady and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. However, Emailgate and other troubles may have at present thrown her campaign off-track or perhaps given it a fatal blow.
There appear to not be any truly viable candidates in the wings for the Democrats. Former Governor Martin O’Malley of Maryland is running around the country attempting to drum up support for his potential candidacy. It appears he has forgotten the recent rejection of his administration by Maryland voters. That and his very liberal philosophy should be a warning to voters throughout the United States. Can he convince voters that he is presidential timber? That could be a tall order.
Republicans need to better enunciate their plans to revive the nation’s economy and to create and sustain a viable foreign policy. The new President must improve U.S. relations between many nations, especially Israel. The Republicans need to remember that you run to win and win to govern. This challenge makes it imperative that the political party that wins the White House in 2016 must communicate effectively with the American electorate.
At this point in American history, both political parties seem to be regurgitating old ideas and concepts. Obviously, new ideas and outlooks are needed in the world of today, with so many issues and problems abounding.
It is interesting to note that three of the potential candidates for the Presidency were elected Senators in close races and have had very limited service in the U.S. Senate. These candidates reflect the experience of the current occupant of the White House. While articulate, these potential candidates are not seasoned executives with the administrative experience that comes from serving as a governor.
There are a number of governors or former governors seeking the Republican nomination. The strength of the Republican may lie within this group. These people have had to make hard decisions, compromise when possible, balance budgets, and face the results of natural disasters. Governor John Kasich of Ohio may be a prime example of this type of state executive.
The dilemma facing the Republican Party is selecting a candidate who has the qualities of winnability, sincerity, vision, and honesty. Where is Abe Lincoln when his party needs him?
The battle for the Republican nomination for President will be full of twists and turns. Candidates will rise and fall as the primary season develops. The real challenge for the Republican Party will be to choose a candidate who can win and lead the nation toward progress, prosperity, and safety.
Carol Voyles says
Republicans may need to do far more than “enunciate” their plans to revive our economy and sustain a viable foreign policy.
They may need to first convince us that they are capable of either endeavor. After all, only two administrations since 1980 have reduced our nation’s deficit while creating far more jobs than their predecessors – and they are Democrats Clinton and Obama. As for foreign policy, Republicans have recently demonstrated an unprecedented willingness to undermine a sitting president.
Where is Lincoln when you need him? Indeed.