Leading the news is the question of whether or not President Trump should nominate someone to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court following the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. So, we ask you….
Take the survey here
Take the Talbot Spy Survey #27 – To Fill or Not to Fill
The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.
Kay says
This Supreme Court vacancy should be filled by the president elected in the Nov election. Just as a Republicans demanded.
Paulette Lawing says
He must follow the constitution and
Nominate someone.
Susan Blankner says
Considering what happened to Obama’s nomination, which was not as close to a national election as this one, ABSOLUTELY NOT. It is a lifetime appointment, and while I understand the politics, I would have the same position on any effort this close to an election.
Richard Skinner says
Ironically, judges are prone to decide with legal precedent guiding them. Mr McConnell set a precedent when he refused to even consider a candidate with more than seven months remaining in President Obama’s, arguing the electorate should, by its choice in the 2016 election presidential election. With voting already underway in the 2020 election, Mr McConnell has determined precedent should not guide his actions.
Marilyn Nace says
No, Trump should NOT nominate someone to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court.
Roger Berkley says
This President and his Senate do not represent, “The will of the people”. This appointment should be made by the President elected on Nov 2nd. They should all be voted out and replaced by Democrats. What hypocrisy.