MENU

Sections

More

July 14, 2025

Talbot Spy

Nonpartisan Education-based News for Talbot County Community

Spy Highlights Point of View From and Fuller

From and Fuller: Elon Musk’s 3rd Party and the Epstein Files MAGA Civil War

by Leave a Comment

Every Thursday, the Spy hosts a conversation with Al From and Craig Fuller on the most topical political news of the moment.

This week, From and Fuller discuss Elon Musk’s plans to create a third party in time for the midterms. Al and Craig also chat about how the Jeffrey Epstein case is dividing MAGA supporters.

This video podcast is approximately sixteen minutes in length.

To listen to the audio podcast version, please use this link:

Background

While the Spy’s public affairs mission has always been hyper-local, it has never limited us from covering national, or even international issues, that impact the communities we serve. With that in mind, we were delighted that Al From and Craig Fuller, both highly respected Washington insiders, have agreed to a new Spy video project called “The Analysis of From and Fuller” over the next year.

The Spy and our region are very lucky to have such an accomplished duo volunteer for this experiment. While one is a devoted Democrat and the other a lifetime Republican, both had long careers that sought out the middle ground of the American political spectrum.

Al From, the genius behind the Democratic Leadership Council’s moderate agenda which would eventually lead to the election of Bill Clinton, has never compromised from this middle-of-the-road philosophy. This did not go unnoticed in a party that was moving quickly to the left in the 1980s. Including progressive Howard Dean saying that From’s DLC was the Republican wing of the Democratic Party.

From’s boss, Bill Clinton, had a different perspective. He said it would be hard to think of a single American citizen who, as a private citizen, has had a more positive impact on the progress of American life in the last 25 years than Al From.”

Al now lives in Annapolis and spends his semi-retirement as a board member of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University (his alma mater) and authoring New Democrats and the Return to Power. He also is an adjunct faculty member at Johns Hopkins’ Krieger School and recently agreed to serve on the Annapolis Spy’s Board of Visitors. He is the author of “New Democrats and the Return to Power.”

For Craig Fuller, his moderation in the Republican party was a rare phenomenon. With deep roots in California’s GOP culture of centralism, Fuller, starting with a long history with Ronald Reagan, leading to his appointment as Reagan’s cabinet secretary at the White House, and later as George Bush’s chief-of-staff and presidential campaign manager was known for his instincts to find the middle ground. Even more noted was his reputation of being a nice guy in Washington, a rare characteristic for a successful tenure in the White House.

Craig has called Easton his permanent home for the last eight years, where he now chairs the board of the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum and is a former board member of the Academy Art Museum and Benedictine.  He also serves on the Spy’s Board of Visitors and writes an e-newsletter available by clicking on DECADE SEVEN.

With their rich experience and long history of friendship, now joined by their love of the Chesapeake Bay, they have agreed through the magic of Zoom, to talk inside politics and policy with the Spy every Thursday.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

A Baltimore Banner Tribute to Darren Foxwell

by 1 Comment

Darren Foxwell

It is with profound sadness that the Spy shares with its readers a Baltimore Banner article about the devastating loss of Darren Foxwell on June 18th. The son of Kerry Daly and Len Foxwell (political consultant and Spy commentator),  Darren lost his life in a car accident outside Trippe at the age of 18.

The Banner’s Cayla Harris does an outstanding job of telling the remarkable story of an extraordinary young person just beginning an adult life full of promise and idealism.

In the words of poet John Donne, “Death, be not proud” today.

Read the full story here. (A paywall may exist) 

 

 

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Publisher Notes: Heartfelt Thanks, Welcome Zack Taylor, Foxwell/Mitchell Back July 9th

by

After the Spy’s first-ever “just once” annual fundraising campaign last month, I’m both grateful and relieved that the Talbot County community responded so demonstratively to help support the Talbot Spy live another day.  With over 400 donations, most of which were under $100, our readers’ contributions made it clear to this publisher and the Spy’s remarkable writers that our mission is valued, and we are filled with gratitude.

Zack Taylor

Secondly, I’m pleased to announce that Zack Taylor has been named the Talbot Spy’s managing editor and vice president of the Spy Community Media Fund at the Mid-Shore Community Foundation. A graduate of both Easton High School and Gettysburg College, Zack spent his first years out of college as a reporter in Montgomery County before his lifetime career at the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) was cut short due to President Donald Trump’s decision to close the agency.

I’m also happy to report that The Spy’s new podcast, Maryland Caucus, with Len Foxwell and Clayton Mitchell, will return on July 9. In addition, J.E. Dean and Maria Grant will be off duty for a couple of weeks this month, and From and Fuller will being taking today off as well.

Once again, a special thanks to our readers for the trust you have given the Spy this year.

Dave Wheelan
Publisher & President
Spy Community Media Fund – MSCF

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

As Talbot Interfaith Shelter Welcomes New  Board Chair, Its Leaders Look to the Future  

by Leave a Comment

 Larry Neviaser (left) and Peter Woicke (right) outside Talbot Interfaith Shelter’s administrative offices in Easton, as Woicke prepares to hand the chairmanship of the NGO’s board over to Neviaser.   

In picturesque Talbot County, the homeless are mostly out of sight and out of mind. Some residents may even be incredulous that such circumstances exist in a community known for its largesse towards the many local charities. 

But as the Talbot Interfaith Shelter – the mid-Shore’s only NGO dedicated to helping the homeless – prepares for a change of leadership on July 1, its top officials here to tell you yes, they do. More than you might think. 

As outgoing Board Chairman Peter Woicke explained in an interview with The Spy alongside his successor, Larry Neviaser, the growth of TIS programs has been driven by the rising number of homeless individuals in Talbot County, mirroring trends across Maryland.

“This county is full of people of means who give generously to the arts and other causes, but homelessness is hidden from view,” Woicke said. “Rural homelessness hides in cars and tents, not on sidewalks. People may be shocked to learn there are 260 homeless students in our schools.”

Woicke, a retired international development financier, recalls that when he took over the board chair in 2019, TIS was a largely a volunteer operation that in just a few years expanded and professionalized to become a resource not only to offer temporary refuge, but provide a stable environment and life counseling to help their residents reclaim control of their personal and professional lives.

“Of course, this amount of growth required infrastructure, staffing and funding,” said Woicke, whose financial expertise has guided TIS since 2006.

“At the start, we depended on volunteers, many from local churches, who still play a critical role for us. Executive Director since 2008, Julie Lowe began her tenure as a volunteer herself. 

Lowe now leads a professional staff of 20 and a small legion of volunteers, including case managers and overnight supervisors who provide mental health support and deliver seminars on financial, business, and parenting skills. The organization serves 50 to 60 people at any given time across its two shelters and 18 subsidized apartments – a fraction of the hundreds that apply due to limited resources.

TIS developed a program called “S4” (Shelter, Stability, Support, Success), which seeks to address the root causes of poverty and guide participants back to self-sufficiency. Residents at the two shelter homes, inconspicuous adjacent houses in the heart of Easton, have daily responsibilities and obligations. Substance and alcohol use is absolutely prohibited. One house is for families, the other for single men and women. 

Once residents secure steady employment, TIS transitions them to subsidized apartments with sliding rent scales until they’re ready to re-enter the commercial housing market.

As he prepares to lead the Board, Neviaser, a retired auto dealer with deep community ties, predicts demand for TIS’s services will grow, especially with the lack of affordable housing and a substantial rise in older people seeking assistance.

He noted that statistics for Talbot generally track with national data for rural areas. Seven of every ten have lost their homes after losing a job, often in combination with illness or family issues, with high rents leaving little margin for error.

“More people than you realize live on that knife’s edge financially,” he said. 

“In Maryland, homelessness has increased 50 percent in the last year,” Neviaser said. “Here in Talbot County, workers with a full-time minimum wage job can’t pay the average rent and have enough to live afterwards. It’s just not possible.”

TIS must choose among applicants who staff think can benefit most, who are willing to sit through interviews and commit to learning from seminars, acquiring social and business skills, and getting back to work. “We wish we could help more people who reach out for our services, but our capacity is limited.”  

To be sure, all these activities require funding. TIS, he points out, receives none from either the town of Easton or Talbot County governments, which only allocates one percent its budget to social services of any kind. More than half of TIS budget comes from private donors, with 7 percent from state grants and some foundation support. 

“Fundraising is a big issue,” Woicke interjects. “We’ve had generous donors. Our new administration building [on Vine Street in Easton] was generously financed by a single donor who was incredulous after learning about our work. There are more out there like him if we can raise awareness.”

Neviaser says that while Talbot Countians give generously, TIS competes for support with cultural nonprofits, which also benefit the community but often attract more attention.

“If people were more aware of what we were doing, I am convinced they would be willing to help us. Folks here are generous when they see the need.”

Woicke, who will remain on the board for two more years before retiring after 20 years of service, reflected on his tenure.

“My wife and I felt we needed to be engaged in the community. We couldn’t just enjoy it without giving back,” he said. “Leading TIS has been deeply satisfying. We’ve made a difference, but there’s still more to do. I am confident we will have continued success under Larry’s leadership.”

To support TIS’s mission to combat homelessness in Talbot County,  click here to donate or volunteer.

 

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Chicken Scratch: Waiting to be Said – The radical power you might not know you have.

by

My daughter sends a viral video of beagles being released from a testing facility. They’ve never felt grass before. They step forward slowly, sniffing at the ground like it might swallow them whole.“The world is a bad place,” she writes.

“And also a good place,” I reply. “Both are true.”

The contradiction lives in me. Some days I carry it like it’s contagious, other days it settles in my chest as grief over the fractures we feed and the loneliness we normalize into background noise. Distrust is high. Civility is low. And somewhere along the way, self-preservation turned into isolation. We move faster, speak less, curate our interactions by keeping eyes on screens, ears plugged with headphones.

Woman seated at a table by herself in a mostly restaurant.

Edward Hopper, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

But sometimes, when I’m out in the world and paying attention, I watch people open outward. In brief exchanges, along the soft edges of connection, I see something generous take root. As the distance between strangers narrows, they seem more complete.

I tell myself I’ll speak to everyone who looks my way. The grocery store is an unlikely place for a revelation, and I spend a minute considering how ridiculous this is. If the pattern of recent visits holds, at least half the shoppers here will be Spanish speaking. I speak next to none. Buenos días. Gracias. That’s about the extent of it. That might be a problem. I use my phone to look up a single sentence, just in case. Tienes una linda sonrisa. I practice saying it out loud until Google Translate recognizes it.

Eye contact is easy enough, and saying hello is a natural step from there. But ugh! Why am I so weird? I’m already letting myself off the hook. Maybe I don’t have the patience for this today. It needs to feel authentic.

I remember and regroup: the awkwardness doesn’t cancel out the goodness of the intention. They can sit side by side.

At the end of the first aisle, I spot an impossibly cute baby in a stroller, dark eyes that match a tiny thundercloud of black hair. I lean in to coo at her, then grin over my shoulder toward her parents. The mother, who is farther back selecting cucumbers, doesn’t see the exchange, but the father beams. I say something. His face answers for him. The whole event lasts seconds, but it breaks the spell of disconnection.

I know every interaction lives inside a complicated context. In a country where skin color and language differences are used to marginalize, offering even a greeting can feel suspicious. There’s risk, and there’s history. But also, there is kindness in the willingness to meet each other, however imperfectly, across those fragile lines. Both are true.

Every encounter carries a subtle transfer of energy. A nod. A glance. A comment about the weather. These gentle collisions don’t look like much, but they’re good at shaping the emotional temperature of a place.

Many people seated at long tables while sharing and being served food.

Pieter Brueghel the Elder, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

 

Humans crave belonging, and there’s research to support what instinct already knows. In 2023, researchers at Sabancı University found that people who regularly engage in brief social exchanges—greetings, small talk, even a simple thank you—report higher levels of well-being than those who don’t. That sense of ease doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It correlates with other markers of social health like lower stress, increased trust, and greater civic engagement.

A few years before, psychologists Nicholas Epley and Juliana Schroeder asked Chicago commuters to strike up conversations with strangers on public transit. Most expected discomfort. Instead, those who spoke reported better moods than those who stayed silent, and so did their conversation partners. The act of reaching out felt awkward in theory, but in practice, it made people feel more alive.

The more we find ourselves in each other, the harder it is to turn away. The more rooted we are in a community, even one as temporary as a checkout line, the more likely we are to extend that care outward. Small talk isn’t just filler. It’s social glue.

It’s also a form of power, a tool we all carry, whether or not we feel equipped to use it. There’s no right way—just the attempt. And the attempt matters. It’s how we soften a culture grown sharp with distance.

I compliment a woman on her paisley blouse. “Lane Bryant,” she says, gleaming, her chin raising with a flicker of pride. When we pass each other in the next aisle, she offers that she’s DoorDashing for someone. I regret that I don’t see her again. I wish I’d told her I’ve never used DoorDash. I have so many questions I’m sure she could answer.

I tell a slender, 30-something that I love his hat. I really do—a saffron, straw fedora. His face lifts, and his posture straightens, like I just called him handsome.

These aren’t performances, they’re acts of recognition. They ask me to tolerate the twinges of discomfort in my gut, and in return, I am, paradoxically, more grounded. Not more human, exactly. I have no idea how I could feel any more human than I do lately. But more aware that I belong, that I’m part of the fabric of a place still mostly holding itself together.

No one is unraveling audibly in the cereal aisle. The planet may be trembling, but there is steadiness here, presence, a felt sense of being part of something normal.

I’m limited in my ability to undo the instability, the injustice, devastation, and cruelty unfolding in the world. But what if the vortex can be interrupted in the produce section? What if eye contact is solidarity? What if saying hello is resistance?

Psychologists call it psychological generosity, these small, low-effort behaviors that ripple outward. When someone feels seen, they’re more likely to see others. A single smile may not register as activism, but it’s a social investment, and it adds up.

These gestures won’t fix everything, and it won’t be obvious that they’ve fixed anything. But gathered across a culture, they can shift us toward one another instead of away. We become harder to divide. We become more likely to pause. We become more likely to care.

On the way home, I watch an ambulance surge through an intersection, the siren slicing the afternoon. I lift up the invisible patient inside, the one who needed an urgent intervention. I think of the caller, the driver, the medical team, the kin, people caring for each other.

Our interconnections are never more obvious. I don’t always get to be the one who changes the story, but I can be a person who stands against indifference.

I never quite work up the nerve to use the sentence I practiced in Spanish. Tienes una linda sonrisa. You have a nice smile. I carry it with me anyway, a pretty pebble in my pocket, an offering, a reminder that presence is its own kind of fluency.

Something still waiting to be said.

Maybe tomorrow, in aisle three.

~Elizabeth

An audio version of this essay, read by the author, is available here.

Elizabeth Beggins is a communications and outreach specialist focused on regional agriculture. She is a former farmer, recovering sailor, and committed over-thinker who appreciates opportunities to kindle conversation and invite connection. On “Chicken Scratch,” a reader-supported publication hosted by Substack, she writes non-fiction essays rooted in realistic optimism. To receive her weekly posts and support her work, become a free or paid subscriber here.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

From and Fuller: Is the Iran Bombing a Win for Trump and NYC Politics

by

Every Thursday, the Spy hosts a conversation with Al From and Craig Fuller on the most topical political news of the moment.

This week, From and Fuller discuss the political impact of President Donald Trump’s decision to bomb nuclear development sites in Iran. Al and Craig also trade thoughts on the unexpected win by Zohran Mamdani over former New York governor Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic primary election this month.

To listen to the audio podcast version, please use this link:

Transcipt

 

Craig, I’d like to start with you this week. A lot of things have changed since we last talked. As we all know, Donald Trump, despite a lot of pushback from experts in the field, decided that his administration was going to move forward and bombed nuclear facilities in Iran last weekend.

And it’s unclear, I think, at this point, what damage was caused, but I can’t believe this won’t be a big political win for President Trump. Would love to have your thoughts.

Craig Fuller (03:10.424)
Well, it was a decisive move. I think we’re still very much at the beginning of understanding just exactly what the result of this move will be. And I think trying to interpret too much before we have more information is probably dangerous. And it’s a trap, by the way, that President Trump immediately fell into when he quickly announced that he’d obliterated the nuclear capability of Iran.

I doubt that actually happened. I do want to start by saying that, and I listened to the full briefing this morning by the Secretary of Defense and, frankly, more importantly, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Probably the briefing by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and I’ve seen the number of them, was probably the most moving and emotional briefing I’ve ever seen given. Because what he did is really paint a picture of how over

15 years, initially two people began working on how we would go about destroying a nuclear capability hidden inside a mountain. And finally they were asked to do it and it involved hundreds of people and aircraft and people who bravely risked their lives flying across the ocean, dropping bombs before they were even known to be in the airspace and then getting safely out and back home.

He described it from the beginning 15 years ago to these aircraft landing at home base and families waving flags. was an extraordinary briefing. And so we ought to pay tribute to the brave men and women who were part of that mission and part of this process. The problem is that 15 years were spent trying to figure out exactly how to put a bomb into a mountain, multiple bombs into mountains, and blow something up.

Presumably, they did that. I don’t mean in any way to dismiss the importance of that, but there is this remarkable invention called a truck. And dozens of trucks clearly hauled away nuclear material before we blew up the mountain. And so while we can and should celebrate the heroic mission, the question becomes, was this an objective worthy of our action?

And will it have long-term consequences? I honestly think that Benjamin Netanyahu planned something starting last year to take advantage of a situation in which a lot of the proxies for Iran have been destroyed or eliminated. And he realized that with his own capabilities, he could take out

the capability of Iran to defend its airspace. He could take out many of the nuclear facilities. He could take out the individuals who were involved in it. What he could not do was go into that inside that mountain and those mountains and blow up the facilities in there. I’m sensing that most of the objective of slowing down Iran was accomplished by what Israel was able to do.

But what Netanyahu was able to do, which has never been done before, is get a president to engage in a military action where no shot was fired against us, necessarily, but engage in a military action that says, we will use our weapons before we allow Iran to have any nuclear capability. That’s a pretty strong message and a pretty strong signal. And it clearly has shaken the leadership of Iran.

And led to at least a temporary ceasefire and maybe the longer term negotiation. But really, there are a lot of unanswered questions. just, I think that the political advantages, if there are any for Donald Trump, are yet to be really understood. And it’s only going to take a few things to go wrong in a region where lots of things go wrong all the time to diminish

whatever the short-term gain might be this week and next and week after. Because again, we have a lot we have to learn.

David Wheelan (07:42.683)
Al, what’s your take? Is this a defining moment for President Trump?

Alvin From (07:49.057)
I think every moment is a defining moment for President Trump. You know, I sort of thought back to something that, and Craig can tell me whether I’m right or wrong on this, but I always attributed to Ronald Reagan, which is the saying, even a broken clock is right twice a day. you know, Trump…

Craig Fuller (08:05.558)
You are correct.

Alvin From (08:11.188)
Probably did the right thing in the mission in Iran, trying to take out the nuclear facilities. But I have no idea about the seriousness or the quality of the analysis that led up to it, how the process.

I mean, everything is done on social media, is announced on social media. For him, it’s part of his reality TV show when he’s dealing with probably the most serious crisis in the world. It came out well, at least it looks like it did in the short term.

no matter how much damage really. And now he sort of proclaims on his social media platform that he has a ceasefire. since the war is over, there is a ceasefire. And that’s a good thing. the outcome to this point, as Craig said, is good.

I mean, you know, think about it. Iran started this war through its proxy Hamas on October 7, 2023. Since that time, it’s seen its proxy Hamas just destroyed, really. It’s seen its strongest proxy Hezbollah eliminated by the Israelis. It’s seen its ally in Syria.

collapse. The Houthi has probably been weakened as well, its other proxy. Then Israel goes in and takes out its missile launching sites and its missiles and its air defenses and does real damage to its nuclear program.

Alvin From (10:33.721)
And Donald Trump comes in and puts the cherry on the cake. so, you know, the wars over Israel won it. You know, I hope Netanyahu, who was a little excessive, very excessive in Gaza, now has a ceasefire in Gaza too, and we have peace in the region. But anybody who’s ever spent any time in the region.

Studying it knows that at least over the last 50 or 60, 70 years, peace doesn’t ever last very long. So, you know, if Donald Trump really is more serious than he appears, maybe he can, you know, maybe he can actually help have a longer peace.

In terms of the political implications, Craig knows the political implications because he had a winning war in 1991, the first Gulf War. President Bush’s approval ratings were at 90%. That gave Bill Clinton an opportunity to run because everybody else got scared. I remember sitting in Detroit at

431 morning as he was waiting for his flight back to Little Rock talking about it. we thought it was possible to put together a campaign that could beat President Bush. Nobody else thought it was possible. We didn’t decide then to do it, but as it turned out, within a year, President Bush’s approval ratings were down in the 30s instead of the 90s.

because the American people really didn’t, you know, they forgot about the war and they worried about what was going on in this country. you know, benefits, political benefits from things like the bombing are short lived and domestic politics will again come to the forefront.

Alvin From (12:57.306)
My guess is by the time of the 2026 midterm elections, this will not be a big deal.

David Wheelan (13:05.88)
Greg, I want to turn our attention to New York City. I think all of us were quite surprised that

Craig Fuller (13:07.092)
Thanks for that.

David Wheelan (13:14.206)
Andrew Como, a well-known governor of the state, even though he had gotten into himself into trouble, was polling very well in New York for some time and he was the apparent person to run for the office in November. Someone that came out of the blue skies there in Montagny won a major victory because in this case,

You had to have a certain majority to win the primary. What was your take on that event?

Craig Fuller (13:51.662)
Well, I’m anxious to hear what Al has to say about it. He is a better student of this, I’m sure, than I am. I thought that Andrew Cuomo was a bit on a foolish mission in trying to recover or resurrect himself by running for office. He left in a fair amount of disgrace around issues which clearly were not going to go away, did not go away.

And he kind of is, I mean, know physically and in so many other ways, the embodiment of the old candidate and old style. so, yes, the challenger was able to take advantage of that and emerge. And as I followed it and as I’ve read about it, I think he did what Al and I have talked about here so often, and that is

He related to people talking about issues they’re really concerned about. And they could slap labels on them. They could call him a socialist. They could say his ideas were pipe dreams and too expensive. But he talked about the burden of the cost of living in New York today. And he talked about ways to reduce that. He talked about making life better for people. So he turned out young voters.

in much larger numbers than one might suspect, motivated to vote for him. He actually captured voters with greater educational experience, and they came out and voted for him. But he seems to have found support all across the city of New York. If he wins this, he’s got a very big task ahead of him.

He is somebody familiar with the city’s government as an assembly person. So he’s not without experience. He certainly is young. But if there’s any message to me coming out of this, and I would caution that it’s hard to extrapolate too much, but it goes to the fact that successful candidates need to reach people where they’re at.

Craig Fuller (16:13.046)
and talk about the issues they’re concerned with. And these sort of resurrecting old candidates in either party may become a bigger challenge. This whole notion, the phrase that I heard over and over again, it’s time to move on. And that’s something that I think will resonate probably in campaigns across the country over the course of the next year and a half.

David Wheelan (16:37.523)
Al, is this the future blueprint for the Democratic Party?

Alvin From (16:42.884)
So it’s the future blueprint for the Democratic Party in New York City. I think it stops at the city limit edge. Mondani was a young, good candidate, as Craig said. He walked the length of Manhattan and talked to people.

He ran against an old bad, really bad candidate who was damaged, tainted. And to be honest with you, I was not that surprised. As the selection was approaching, the polls were closing. And I was reminded of something that an old Democratic pollster sort of

named Pat Cadell, who had told me one time. I believe it was in 1976, my friend and my first boss on the Hill, Joe Tidings, who had been defeated in 1970, was running for reelection or wanting to get his seat back against Paul Sarbanes. And I got Cadell to be his poster.

And Tidings was running ahead by 20 points. It was like a mid-May primary and Tidings was up by 20 points early in the year and Cadell said he’s going to lose by 20. And he said, you know, if he’s not up by 40 points by April 1st with six weeks to go, he’s going to lose this election because what happens with a candidate like Cuomo,

They get an enormous boost at the beginning because they have high name recognition. But then people start to remember why they didn’t support him or what his problems were. And so as you get close to the election and that becomes more the focus, the other candidate rises. In this case, we had a young democratic socialist who was, you know, spoke in favor of a global infatata. I don’t think that will sell nationally.

Alvin From (19:06.052)
who swept the primary. Now, I don’t know whether there’s going to be a big contest in the general. Adams, Eric Adams, is going to run as an independent, but he too, Cuomo, is a flawed candidate, so that may not make any difference. But just to give you a sense, is this going to be the future of the Democratic Party? I don’t really think so. Think about this. Kamala Harris won New York City by 38 points.

That’s not the way the country votes. You know, he had a bunch of ideas, free rent or free universities, rent control, free transportation, government owning grocery stores, all sorts of things like that. I don’t think that’s a platform you can win on nationally. He won young voters, he won highly educated voters.

He won high-income voters. It’s sort of that more elite democratic coalition that is really powerful in democratic primaries. And remember, this is a democratic primary in a very blue and very liberal democratic place.

you know, across Manhattan and parts of Queens and parts of Brooklyn. That’s a very powerful coalition, but it isn’t reflective of the country. just one caution, because remember in 2020 when Bernie Sanders won the early primaries and everybody thought Biden was out, what stopped him? was the black vote in South Carolina. And the one group of voters that Dami didn’t win.

was black voters. So it’s a great victory for him. He probably will be the next mayor of New York. you know, sort of socialist, very liberal, left-foot leaning democratic mayors have not been successful in the country. There was an editorial in the Chicago Tribune earlier.

Alvin From (21:22.571)
or at the end of last week warning New York about what happened in Chicago where they elected a similar guy and he’s now got an approval rating of about 20 % or less, had been down as low as six. So it may be reflective of New York, it’s not reflective of the country and it’s certainly not the future of the Democratic Party. The future of the Democratic Party, as I said last week on this show.

are people like Mikey Shero, Abigail Spanberger, Alyssa Slotkin, Ram, Wes Moore, Gavin Newsom.

David Wheelan (22:02.23)
Well, we have to leave it there. Al from Craig Fuller. Thanks so much indeed. We will see you next week. And now it’s time for our bonus round and we are now calling this Hot Takes. And Craig, you’re up first.

Craig Fuller (22:06.526)
We will see.

Alvin From (22:09.282)
And that’s the perfect answer.

Craig Fuller (22:16.411)
Well, my hot take for this week focuses on the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hickseth. Because in today’s press briefing, if the chairman of the Joint Chiefs gave one of the most moving, emotional, and fact-based presentations ever, Pete Hickseth came with his enemy clearly in sight, and he attacked and attacked and attacked. And that enemy that he was focused on was the press corps.

It is a performance like no other. Contrast it to Rumsfeld, former Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, who enjoyed the volleying back and forth with the press. He respected the press. Hegseth shows disdain for the press. And if there’s one thing that undermines any useful relationship, it’s disdain. And the irony of all this is that what he’s most upset about are unforced heirs committed

by his own people. the biggest gripe is that a preliminary damage report from the Defense Intelligence Agency, a group within the Defense Department, was shared with people on Capitol Hill, and it leaked. Well, you know what? If you share something on Capitol Hill, it’s likely to leak, especially if it’s newsworthy. But CNN is not guilty. CNN reported it as a preliminary assessment. CNN reported it as did the New York Times.

as the first of many more to come. But it did one thing that’s crossed the line. It made Donald Trump look foolish because he said everything in Iran related to nuclear weapons had been obliterated and this cast doubt on it. so, Hegseth was set out to attack the press. I really think he should take a victory lap if that’s what he wants and go do something else because as Secretary of Defense, he’s neither a very reliable advisor

Nor is he a spokesman that’s up to the task.

David Wheelan (24:15.111)
Al, what’s yours?

Alvin From (24:17.793)
Well, my hot take this week comes from a story that I saw in the Washington Post a couple of days ago that says the Trump administration is preparing to challenge the U.S. budget laws or the Budget Reform Act by impounding money for something like 200 programs.

You know, the single most important, there are two critically important congressional prerogatives. One obviously is the power to make war, and they’ve sort of given that away a little bit with the War Powers Act. And at least since World War II, presidents have been more willing to commit our forces without going to Congress than before. so that’s a big deal.

But the second is the power of the purse. With all the attention on Iran and on this big, beautiful, disastrous bill that’s coming down the pike, and all the attention that Elon Musk got for Doge, sort of behind the scenes, Russell Voight,

head of the OMB and the architect of most of these Trump policies and project 2025 has always believed that the Congressional Budget Reform and Empowerment Control Act, which is right up on my wall to the right, the pen to it is, which we did in 1974, signed by President Nixon, he always thought that is unconstitutional.

and they’re going to try to prove it. mean, they’re basically going to try to force the issue. Probably will eventually have to be decided by the Supreme Court. But if the power of the purse is taken away from the Congress, mean, when Nixon impounded money, a bipartisan group of senators just raised holy hell, including the late Senator Bill Brock, had been Republican of the…

Alvin From (26:37.866)
party chairman, lived his later life in Annapolis, a dear friend of mine. And he, with my old boss, Senator Ed Muskie, led, and Senator Sam Irvin, the great constitutionalist, led the effort to draft this act to really safeguard congressional power of the purse. If that is destroyed, another really important pillar of our democracy will have been undermined.

David Wheelan (27:09.92)
OK, well thanks guys and we’ll see you next week. Alright.

 

Background

While the Spy’s public affairs mission has always been hyper-local, it has never limited us from covering national, or even international issues, that impact the communities we serve. With that in mind, we were delighted that Al From and Craig Fuller, both highly respected Washington insiders, have agreed to a new Spy video project called “The Analysis of From and Fuller” over the next year.

The Spy and our region are very lucky to have such an accomplished duo volunteer for this experiment. While one is a devoted Democrat and the other a lifetime Republican, both had long careers that sought out the middle ground of the American political spectrum.

Al From, the genius behind the Democratic Leadership Council’s moderate agenda which would eventually lead to the election of Bill Clinton, has never compromised from this middle-of-the-road philosophy. This did not go unnoticed in a party that was moving quickly to the left in the 1980s. Including progressive Howard Dean saying that From’s DLC was the Republican wing of the Democratic Party.

From’s boss, Bill Clinton, had a different perspective. He said it would be hard to think of a single American citizen who, as a private citizen, has had a more positive impact on the progress of American life in the last 25 years than Al From.”

Al now lives in Annapolis and spends his semi-retirement as a board member of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University (his alma mater) and authoring New Democrats and the Return to Power. He also is an adjunct faculty member at Johns Hopkins’ Krieger School and recently agreed to serve on the Annapolis Spy’s Board of Visitors. He is the author of “New Democrats and the Return to Power.”

For Craig Fuller, his moderation in the Republican party was a rare phenomenon. With deep roots in California’s GOP culture of centralism, Fuller, starting with a long history with Ronald Reagan, leading to his appointment as Reagan’s cabinet secretary at the White House, and later as George Bush’s chief-of-staff and presidential campaign manager was known for his instincts to find the middle ground. Even more noted was his reputation of being a nice guy in Washington, a rare characteristic for a successful tenure in the White House.

Craig has called Easton his permanent home for the last eight years, where he now chairs the board of the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum and is a former board member of the Academy Art Museum and Benedictine.  He also serves on the Spy’s Board of Visitors and writes an e-newsletter available by clicking on DECADE SEVEN.

With their rich experience and long history of friendship, now joined by their love of the Chesapeake Bay, they have agreed through the magic of Zoom, to talk inside politics and policy with the Spy every Thursday.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

From and Fuller: Trump’s Big Iran Problem, Military Parades and No Kings

by

Every Thursday, the Spy hosts a conversation with Al From and Craig Fuller on the most topical political news of the moment.

This week, From and Fuller discuss President Trump’s pending decision on whether the United States to join Israel in their war with Iran. Al and Craig also trade thoughts on the Army’s parade in Washington and the No Kings protests across the country last weekend.

This video podcast is approximately sixteen minutes in length.

To listen to the audio podcast version, please use this link:

Background

While the Spy’s public affairs mission has always been hyper-local, it has never limited us from covering national, or even international issues, that impact the communities we serve. With that in mind, we were delighted that Al From and Craig Fuller, both highly respected Washington insiders, have agreed to a new Spy video project called “The Analysis of From and Fuller” over the next year.

The Spy and our region are very lucky to have such an accomplished duo volunteer for this experiment. While one is a devoted Democrat and the other a lifetime Republican, both had long careers that sought out the middle ground of the American political spectrum.

Al From, the genius behind the Democratic Leadership Council’s moderate agenda which would eventually lead to the election of Bill Clinton, has never compromised from this middle-of-the-road philosophy. This did not go unnoticed in a party that was moving quickly to the left in the 1980s. Including progressive Howard Dean saying that From’s DLC was the Republican wing of the Democratic Party.

From’s boss, Bill Clinton, had a different perspective. He said it would be hard to think of a single American citizen who, as a private citizen, has had a more positive impact on the progress of American life in the last 25 years than Al From.”

Al now lives in Annapolis and spends his semi-retirement as a board member of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University (his alma mater) and authoring New Democrats and the Return to Power. He also is an adjunct faculty member at Johns Hopkins’ Krieger School and recently agreed to serve on the Annapolis Spy’s Board of Visitors. He is the author of “New Democrats and the Return to Power.”

For Craig Fuller, his moderation in the Republican party was a rare phenomenon. With deep roots in California’s GOP culture of centralism, Fuller, starting with a long history with Ronald Reagan, leading to his appointment as Reagan’s cabinet secretary at the White House, and later as George Bush’s chief-of-staff and presidential campaign manager was known for his instincts to find the middle ground. Even more noted was his reputation of being a nice guy in Washington, a rare characteristic for a successful tenure in the White House.

Craig has called Easton his permanent home for the last eight years, where he now chairs the board of the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum and is a former board member of the Academy Art Museum and Benedictine.  He also serves on the Spy’s Board of Visitors and writes an e-newsletter available by clicking on DECADE SEVEN.

With their rich experience and long history of friendship, now joined by their love of the Chesapeake Bay, they have agreed through the magic of Zoom, to talk inside politics and policy with the Spy every Thursday.

r

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

From and Fuller: The Los Angeles Protests and the Rise of Gavin Newsom

by

Every Thursday, the Spy hosts a conversation with Al From and Craig Fuller on the most topical political news of the moment.

This week, From and Fuller discuss Donald Trump’s decision to send National Guard units to Los Angeles against the wishes of California Governor Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass to protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers as they search and arrest undocumented aliens. Both Al and Craig also assess Newsom’s leadership and rising political profile.

This video podcast is approximately sixteen minutes in length.

To listen to the audio podcast version, please use this link:


Background

While the Spy’s public affairs mission has always been hyper-local, it has never limited us from covering national, or even international issues, that impact the communities we serve. With that in mind, we were delighted that Al From and Craig Fuller, both highly respected Washington insiders, have agreed to a new Spy video project called “The Analysis of From and Fuller” over the next year.

The Spy and our region are very lucky to have such an accomplished duo volunteer for this experiment. While one is a devoted Democrat and the other a lifetime Republican, both had long careers that sought out the middle ground of the American political spectrum.

Al From, the genius behind the Democratic Leadership Council’s moderate agenda which would eventually lead to the election of Bill Clinton, has never compromised from this middle-of-the-road philosophy. This did not go unnoticed in a party that was moving quickly to the left in the 1980s. Including progressive Howard Dean, who said that From’s DLC was the Republican wing of the Democratic Party.

From’s boss, Bill Clinton, had a different perspective. He said it would be hard to think of a single American citizen who, as a private citizen, has had a more positive impact on the progress of American life in the last 25 years than Al From.”

Al now lives in Annapolis and spends his semi-retirement as a board member of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University (his alma mater) and authoring New Democrats and the Return to Power. He also is an adjunct faculty member at Johns Hopkins’ Krieger School and recently agreed to serve on the Annapolis Spy’s Board of Visitors. He is the author of “New Democrats and the Return to Power.”

For Craig Fuller, his moderation in the Republican party was a rare phenomenon. With deep roots in California’s GOP culture of centralism, Fuller, starting with a long history with Ronald Reagan, leading to his appointment as Reagan’s cabinet secretary at the White House, and later as George Bush’s chief-of-staff and presidential campaign manager was known for his instincts to find the middle ground. Even more noted was his reputation of being a nice guy in Washington, a rare characteristic for a successful tenure in the White House.

Craig has called Easton his permanent home for the last eight years, where he now chairs the board of the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum and is a former board member of the Academy Art Museum and Benedictine.  He also serves on the Spy’s Board of Visitors and writes an e-newsletter available by clicking on DECADE SEVEN.

With their rich experience and long history of friendship, now joined by their love of the Chesapeake Bay, they have agreed through the magic of Zoom, to talk inside politics and policy with the Spy every Thursday.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Maryland Caucus with Foxwell and Mitchell: Moore Budget Cuts and LA Protests Impact on MD Politics

by

Every Wednesday, Maryland political analysts Len Foxwell and Clayton Mitchell discuss the politics and personalities of the state and region.

This week, Len and Clay discuss Maryland Governor Wes Moore’s announcement that his administration has found nearly $400 million in budget savings over the next two decades. They also chat about the impact on Moore’s presidential prospects in the wake of California Governor Gavin Newsom’s handling of the Los Angeles protests, among other winners and losers of the week.

This video is approximately 19 minutes in length.

###

This series brings together two of the most experienced and respected voices in Maryland public life: Len Foxwell and Clayton A. Mitchell, Sr. Their mission is to explore Maryland’s evolving political terrain, from the State House in Annapolis to the communities of the Eastern Shore.

Foxwell and Mitchell may come from different corners of the public square—one a strategist and public communicator, the other a jurist and administrative law expert—but they share a lifelong commitment to the mechanics and meaning of public service. Together, they offer something increasingly rare in American discourse: thoughtful, informed, and good-humored conversation grounded in facts, history, and lived experience.

Len Foxwell, founder of Tred Avon Strategies, is widely regarded as one of Maryland’s most influential political strategists. A veteran of nearly three decades in public life, he served as chief of staff to the Comptroller of Maryland from 2008 to 2020, where he was credited with helping build one of the nation’s most effective and forward-looking tax enforcement offices.

During that time, the Comptroller’s office recaptured more than $6 billion in unpaid taxes and won national praise for combating tax fraud and unethical financial practices. But Foxwell’s public impact wasn’t limited to budgetary stewardship. He also played a pivotal role in modernizing Maryland’s craft alcohol industry, working to ease outdated regulations and encourage growth for breweries, wineries, and distilleries across the state.

A writer and educator at heart, Foxwell also teaches professional writing and crisis communication at Johns Hopkins University. As one veteran journalist once wrote, “There are plenty of operatives who are talented and indispensable to their bosses. But only Foxwell has actually changed the trajectory of Maryland politics.”

Clayton A. Mitchell, Sr., brings an equally deep and distinguished record of public service. A native of the Eastern Shore, Mitchell served on the Maryland Department of Labor’s Board of Appeals for nearly 30 years, including four years as its Chairman. Appointed in 1994 by Governor William Donald Schaefer and reappointed by four successive governors from both parties, Mitchell presided over the state’s highest appellate authority for unemployment insurance disputes, helping shape how fairness and due process are applied to tens of thousands of Maryland workers.

A magna cum laude graduate of the University of Baltimore School of Law, Mitchell has also worked to expand legal access through education. He founded the Student Attorney Advocacy Program at his law school alma mater to ensure indigent claimants could receive representation in appeals proceedings. In addition to his public duties, he has maintained a part-time legal practice focused on administrative, land use, and environmental law.

Mitchell is equally respected for his civic leadership. He has served on the Selective Service Board and the Maryland Attorney General’s Environmental Advisory Council, authored legal reference works, and endowed a scholarship to help Maryland students pursue legal careers. As he said in a recent reflection, “Public service isn’t just about policy. It’s about people—about making sure the system works for everyone, especially those who don’t have a lobbyist or a lawyer.”

Together, Foxwell and Mitchell represent two sides of the same democratic coin—strategy and structure, politics and process, insight and institution. With the Maryland Caucus, they’ll shine a spotlight on the issues shaping Maryland today: education funding, judicial reform, land use, regional economics, environmental priorities, campaign strategy, and more.

Expect each episode to be as frank as it is thoughtful. Or as Foxwell recently quipped, “It may be called The Maryland Caucus, but we’re not handing out talking points.”

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

From and Fuller: The GOP Senate’s Big Beautiful Problem and Elon Musk Leaves the Building

by

Every Thursday, the Spy hosts a conversation with Al From and Craig Fuller on the most topical political news of the moment.

This week, From and Fuller discuss whether the Republican-controlled Senate will have at least four members willing to vote against the Trump-backed spending and tax bill, which is projected to increase the country’s debt by trillions and reduce social safety net federal programs. Al and Craig also share their thoughts on the end of Elon Musk’s tenure in the Trump White House.

And during the Spy’s only fundraising drive this year, Craig asks viewers to support local journalism on the Mid-Shore. Donations can be made here.

This video podcast is approximately sixteen minutes in length.

To listen to the audio podcast version, please use this link:

Background

While the Spy’s public affairs mission has always been hyper-local, it has never limited us from covering national, or even international issues, that impact the communities we serve. With that in mind, we were delighted that Al From and Craig Fuller, both highly respected Washington insiders, have agreed to a new Spy video project called “The Analysis of From and Fuller” over the next year.

The Spy and our region are very lucky to have such an accomplished duo volunteer for this experiment. While one is a devoted Democrat and the other a lifetime Republican, both had long careers that sought out the middle ground of the American political spectrum.

Al From, the genius behind the Democratic Leadership Council’s moderate agenda which would eventually lead to the election of Bill Clinton, has never compromised from this middle-of-the-road philosophy. This did not go unnoticed in a party that was moving quickly to the left in the 1980s. Including progressive Howard Dean saying that From’s DLC was the Republican wing of the Democratic Party.

From’s boss, Bill Clinton, had a different perspective. He said it would be hard to think of a single American citizen who, as a private citizen, has had a more positive impact on the progress of American life in the last 25 years than Al From.”

Al now lives in Annapolis and spends his semi-retirement as a board member of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University (his alma mater) and authoring New Democrats and the Return to Power. He also is an adjunct faculty member at Johns Hopkins’ Krieger School and recently agreed to serve on the Annapolis Spy’s Board of Visitors. He is the author of “New Democrats and the Return to Power.”

For Craig Fuller, his moderation in the Republican party was a rare phenomenon. With deep roots in California’s GOP culture of centralism, Fuller, starting with a long history with Ronald Reagan, leading to his appointment as Reagan’s cabinet secretary at the White House, and later as George Bush’s chief-of-staff and presidential campaign manager was known for his instincts to find the middle ground. Even more noted was his reputation of being a nice guy in Washington, a rare characteristic for a successful tenure in the White House.

Craig has called Easton his permanent home for the last eight years, where he now chairs the board of the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum and is a former board member of the Academy Art Museum and Benedictine.  He also serves on the Spy’s Board of Visitors and writes an e-newsletter available by clicking on DECADE SEVEN.

With their rich experience and long history of friendship, now joined by their love of the Chesapeake Bay, they have agreed through the magic of Zoom, to talk inside politics and policy with the Spy every Thursday.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.