sky
The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.
Nonpartisan Education-based News for Talbot County Community
The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Maryland’s $340 million settlement with the owner of the Conowingo Dam can now move forward, after a group of Eastern Shore counties dropped their challenge of the deal.
The withdrawal came less than a month after the administrative appeal was originally filed. Officials at the Maryland Department of the Environment, which brokered the key settlement deal, had lobbied hard for the handful of counties to back down.
That’s because the appeal had the potential to derail or delay the funds from dam owner Constellation, which are designated for various environmental projects. The state negotiated to receive the funds in exchange for issuing the hydroelectric dam a crucial water quality certification, which it needs in order to obtain a 50-year license from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
“We are very excited to move out of the courtroom and into action. After nearly a decade of legal challenges we can now put this $340M to work to accelerate progress on the Bay,” wrote Maryland Department of the Environment spokesperson Dave Abrams in a statement. “Thank you to the local governments who worked closely with us to reach this resolution. We are all on the same team and will work closely with them and other stakeholders as we move forward.”
After Maryland officials promised counties they could have input on the rollout of the environmental projects in the settlement, several counties pulled out in late December. Cecil County — which hosts the dam and has complained about the impacts of sediment build-up — was the final hold-out, but dropped out on Friday.
“Over the holidays, MDE and Cecil County Government held productive, transparent discussions that clarified the settlement and secured assurances on Upper Shore project focus, municipal reimbursement for sediment and debris damage, front-loading $18.7 million for dredging studies, and Cecil County’s participation in an advisory council with other Shore counties. As our concerns were addressed, we felt comfortable withdrawing our appeal,” wrote Cecil County spokesperson Robert Royster in a statement.
The counties had expressed frustration that they were not given input on the settlement arrangement until after it was made final. But the negotiations were confidential, because they were also meant to resolve litigation between the state, Constellation and several waterkeepers groups who intervened. The Eastern Shore counties did not intervene in that legal battle.
The appeal was filed by an advocacy group called the Clean Chesapeake Coalition, which includes many Eastern Shore county officials who have long voiced frustration with the dam’s impact on the environment, and specifically the Chesapeake Bay.
The dam, which was built in 1928, once trapped damaging pollutants racing down the Susquehanna River, which contributes about half of the bay’s fresh water, and serves as its largest tributary. But now, the reservoir behind the dam is essentially full, meaning it can no longer trap sediment, and can release large amounts during storm events, with the potential to bury underwater life, and carry harmful nutrient pollution along with it.
Under the settlement, Constellation will put tens of millions of dollars toward tree and underwater grass planting, improvements to fish passage, trash and debris removal and invasive species remediation.
But the agreement also includes provisions about an oft-discussed but controversial strategy for dealing with the dam’s sediment: dredging. Over the next 25 years, Constellation will pay $18.7 million into a fund focused on dredging. But first, all eyes are on an upcoming study from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which will assess whether dredging the Conowingo reservoir is advisable.
If the Army Corps determines dredging is feasible, Maryland can use the funds from Constellation to conduct further study or begin the permitting process for dredging. If the Army Corps deems dredging inadvisable, Maryland can designate the money for other environmental purposes.
For now, though, Constellation will be focused on obtaining its 50-year license from FERC after a federal court reversed the last one. That occurred because Maryland had not issued a water quality certification for Conowingo, instead waiving its right to do so. This time, Maryland has issued the certification, and is aiming for its conditions to be incorporated into the dam’s new federal license to operate.
By Christine Condon – Maryland Matters, January 5, 2026
Maryland Matters is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Maryland Matters maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Steve Crane for questions: [email protected].
The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Mickey Terrone
Oxford
The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.


Talbot County: Easton, Maryland, World War II Prisoner of War Camp. The THS archive sheet states this fascinating photo was donated by Walter J. Harmsen and that the POW Camp was where the airport is, but the question is, which airport? Webb Airport on Dover Rd or our present airport? Does your family have any stories of POW’s who worked on their Talbot Co. Farms during the World War II years??
Contact: Cathy Hill [email protected] to share your old photos. Comment. Like our page and join THS!
The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.
by Dave Wheelan

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.


Artist Jack Lewis painted this watercolor of Lawyer’s Row in Chestertown, across from the Masonic Lodge building, in the mid 20th century.
Lawyer’s Row on Court Street in Chestertown, a collection of distinctive one-story offices crowded together in the shadows of the nearby courthouse, for centuries has been witnessing wills, title searches and property transfers, a wide variety of contracts, divorces and other civil and criminal legal matters.
Though the digital age has diluted the once-steady flow of people walking between the law offices and the Kent County courts, Lawyer’s Row today continues to house at least five active law offices and the practices of more than a dozen lawyers. Peeling paint, cob webs and crooked windows here and there signal varying degrees of maintenance while adding to the charm wrought by decades of generational transactions over the decades. At least one of the offices has been converted to a ‘pied a terre’ style residence while another’s windows now sport photos of real estate listings.
In the early 1950s, prolific Eastern Shore artist Jack Lewis published a large-format hard cover book titled The Chesapeake Bay Scene. In his ramblings up and down the shore, Lewis captured the people and places of the tidewater region in literally hundreds of sketches and watercolors.
Lawyer’s Row caught his attention during a visit to Chestertown. As was his wont, Lewis set up his easel near the edge of a nearby street and went about freezing a moment in time on a fair weather day.

A large sycamore tree, shown here, used to shade a wide swath of Lawyers Row but was removed in the past year due to disease. “It was almost completely dead,” said Billy Sullivan of Bartlett Tree. “Branches five and six inches in diameter were falling on the buildings and sidewalks. It had become a real hazard.” Sullivan, a member of the Chestertown Tree Committee, said discussions are underway about possibly replacing the tree which had reached an age, he guessed, between 60 and 75 years.
In addition to his artistic work, Lewis wrote notes to accompany each scene, including human interest, composition and philosophy details that rambled through his brain between the colorful dashes of his brush strokes. Here are the notes he recorded, as a young artist, with his Lawyer’s Row scene.
“Title: Lawyers Row, Chestertown

Sam Heck has been practicing law for more than three decades in the Lawyers Row office where his father, Preston P. Heck, practiced for several decades before him.
“Human Interest: The name explains itself . . . a row of charming little houses . . . law offices. People are busily stepping from one doorway to another, and in and out of the soft maple shade. It is like a song in true harmony. A cart lumbers along the street in an interval sufficient to make itself fixed indelibly upon the design. As I stood at my painting a man spoke to me. Upon raising my eyes, they rested upon a most radiant subject. A blooming young woman with flaxen hair, eyes dark with mascara and false lashes, great gray eyes. In confusion my attention switched between the two people. The young man ranted on until she quite abruptly cried, ‘Come on Bill! Let the kid alone.’”
Lewis clearly had an eye for more than just architecture. Though he didn’t paint the ‘blooming young woman,’ he did include in his Chesapeake Bay Scene many portraits of the people he encountered in his travels. People coming upon artists working outside ‘en plein air’ usually have to satisfy their curiosity by taking a look at the work in progress and chatting it up with the artist.
His comments about Lawyer’s Row continue:
“Composition: As the cart passed, the question arose. ‘Will it fit with the composition?’ During a flash of resolve I reached for the cart. It found a place in the design just below the houses. Coincidentally, the wagon had the coloring of the trees and houses.
“Philosophy: The universe seems to sing when all its components fit in well together. To be on a corner in Chestertown witnessing the singing of all the parts of ‘Lawyers Row’ rewarded me with a sense of well being. What better way to start off than with such awareness of the harmony of the world then to pause somewhere and paint it!”
Lead photo: Artist Jack Lewis painted this watercolor of Lawyer’s Row in Chestertown, across from the Masonic Lodge building, in the mid 20th century.
All photos by Dennis Forney.
The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.
You don’t expect a garbage bag in Easton’s dormant downtown storefront windows to be the reminder of a major museum exhibition, but that’s exactly the point. People walked by, puzzled. “Is it an antique shop? What is this?” For the Academy Art Museum’s Executive Director Charlotte Potter Kasic, the bag wasn’t trash. It was a playful nod to Robert Rauschenberg.
“Our team has had fun with the downtown ‘takeover.’ The windows have continued to evolve, and we’ve been going in and changing things each week.” For her, that storefront prop is an easy entry point to the man himself—a way of saying that he used everyday objects on purpose, making art people recognized.
But most people walking past Easton’s storefront windows have no idea that this was Rauschenberg’s language—or that he has a real connection to this area. And that is why the Museum is opening Rauschenberg 100: New Connections on December 11, an exhibition that will remain on view through May 3, 2026 and place Easton right in the middle of his worldwide centennial celebration.

Robert Rauschenberg
“Do you know who Robert Rauschenberg is?” Kasic asked as we began talking. “It’s interesting. A lot of people in our community do not understand what a powerful artist, change-maker, and influencer he was.”
“Rauschenberg was an incredible sculptor, artist, collaborator, printmaker—and, turns out, photographer,” she said. “He was one of those essential culture makers at Black Mountain College. He worked with John Cage. He worked with Merce Cunningham. He and Jasper Johns were lovers. He had a marriage and a son. He was a really interesting guy.”
His work, she said, grew out of a desire to re-ground abstract expressionism into things people recognized. “He wanted to make everyday art for the everyday person. Things had gotten so abstract people didn’t understand it anymore.”
From there, Kasic shifted to what the exhibit means for the Museum itself. “One of the things I’ve been saying about our identity is that, to do good things, there has to be a trinity. We need to be honest with our origin story—founded by artists, for artists. We need regional specificity, and we need excellence.”
And that’s when the local connection comes into focus.
Rauschenberg worked closely with artist, art historian, and master printmaker Donald Saff, known for his collaborations with Roy Lichtenstein, James Turrell, and others. After an illustrious career at the University of South Florida, Saff moved to Talbot County and continued working with these major artists at Saff Tech Arts, his studio in Oxford. “Rauschenberg was making this work right here in Talbot County, which is insane to me,” Kasic said.
That history leads directly to the centerpiece of the show: Chinese Summerhall, the hundred-foot-long color photograph Rauschenberg made during a 1982 trip to China.
“It was a cultural exchange,” Kasic said. “He was trying to mend the woes of society through understanding one another through art. And that also happens to be very timely right now.”
Apparently, Rauschenberg isn’t new to the Museum; they’ve had pieces connected to this project for years. Their Rauschenbergs include more than twenty related works—test prints, studies, and editions that show how the project developed. “Our work is really only interesting when you realize in context that, yes, they’re limited editions in their own right, but really it was all leading up to this monumental piece,” she said.
Bringing that piece to Easton, however, was not simple. There are only four of the hundred-foot works in existence: one at the Guggenheim, one in Florida, one with the Rauschenberg Foundation, and one at the National Gallery.
“We went to the University of South Florida, because that’s where it was made,” she said. “They agreed to loan it to us. We were full ahead for the show. And then the main contact person suddenly no longer worked there, and the loan fell through.”

That changed the entire exhibition plan. “Without the 100-footer, this story falls flat,” she said. “Everything was leading to that.”
Curator-at-large Lee Glazer then stepped in. “Lee wouldn’t take no for an answer,” Kasic said. “She went to the Rauschenberg Foundation and told them, ‘Our loan just fell through, and the National Gallery and the Guggenheim said no. Will you loan us yours?’ So it was like our last chance. And she got it.”
And that’s how the rarely exhibited photograph will now be seen in Easton. It documents Rauschenberg’s first journey to China and his creative partnership with Saff.
Another piece of the exhibit is the documentary the Museum commissioned, featuring local Talbot residents Saff and George Holzer, walking through how Chinese Summerhall came to be—starting with Saff nervously driving Rauschenberg around Tampa and getting lost.
“I finally got up enough nerve and said, ‘Would you consider working with me?’” Saff says in the film. He then recalls Rauschenberg rejecting the fine French art paper Saff offered and choosing the custodians’ garbage bags instead. (Which makes the Easton storefront prop feel very on point.)
The film moves from those small moments into the larger story: the China trip—the scrolls, the colors, the fifty rolls of film—and finally the darkroom marathon, where five enlargers were moved by hand to build the image eight to ten feet at a time. “All it took was one exposure to be off on one enlarger, and it’s trash,” Holzer says. “We were down to the last chance.” And time was tight: the work was due at the Leo Castelli Gallery on New Year’s Eve.
Eventually, they ran it through the processor and hoped.
It worked.
The film ends with Saff’s move to the Eastern Shore and to a small building on Oxford Road, where, as one voice in the film puts it, “artists make the dreams of other artists come alive.”
The film is only part of the experience. Around the exhibition, the Museum is offering what Kasic describes as “a lot of different ways to engage with it over time.”
There will be classes inspired by Rauschenberg’s techniques, including China ink painting on Xuan paper; a performance of John Cage’s music; mixed-media workshops; a lecture by Don Saff; and a February 21 talk by Rauschenberg’s son, photographer Chris Rauschenberg.
There is also a strong community component tied to sponsorship.
Those who join by December 1 receive tickets to the VIP preview party on December 10, the first official unveiling of the exhibition. They’ll also be entered to win a signed Rauschenberg print from the same series, made with Saff, along with access to private programs, behind-the-scenes events, and the exhibition publication.
It won’t end there. The Museum’s Spring Gala will serve as the closing celebration of the show. “The whole gala is going to be Rauschenberg-themed,” Kasic said.
As we wrapped up, Kasic underscored what she’d love to see. “I hope everybody brings their whole family here,” she said. “Between Christmas and New Year’s—when everybody’s in town and feeling like we’ve stared at each other enough—now let’s get out of the house. I want them to come to the Museum. We’re free. We’re open to the public.”
“I’m so proud of this show,” she said.
Since it’s his birthday, I thought Rauschenberg should have the last word. In the film, he’s asked why he kept pushing himself into new places and collaborations. This is how he responded: “I want my work to make you proud of yourself and make you care about the world and everything that is in it. I care. I care. I’m paying the world back for having been born. That’s my rent.”
A hundred years on, the sentiment still holds.
For more info:
https://academyartmuseum.org/rauschenberg-100-new-connections/
The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.
by Al Sikes

Thanksgiving is one of those holidays that is quite understandable. We give thanks for many things in our lives and beyond. And it is universal; it doesn’t, for example, depend on a particular religious faith. But, I am going to get started with a religious allusion.
The bible said, in relationship to the crucification of Jesus Christ, that religious leaders at the crucification mocked him saying, “He saved others; let him save himself if he is the Messiah of God, his chosen one.” Luke: 23:35. The faithful say God’s plan resulted in him returning on the “third day.”
“Save himself”—how about our saving ourselves? I am in my eighth decade and have rarely seen America more fragmented. I have lived through wars and assassinations and can put today’s lack of a unifying thread in context. It’s worse. Do we need to be attacked to be more unified?
Thanksgiving, the word, invites for me a summing up. Have there been unwelcome moments in 2025? Most certainly. Topping the list would be the death of friends. More later. A close second would be our political distemper.
Most unfortunately: the person who leads one of our aspirations—united states— has chosen division. On the side of hope, I believe his stance will turn out to be a hinge moment—an increased appreciation for the hope that is the hinge of unity. If unity is ineffectual, we are left with what one writer called, “the Serengeti”, it’s prey/predator reality. I hope that this Thanksgiving we will see the beginning of a revival.
The America we know evolved from an aspirational revolution. In a sense, one of hope. The immigrants that first came to America were looking for opportunity. Many were fleeing division among classes. They didn’t want to be penalized because they were not “well bred” and ultimately their generational offspring fought a war and then composed the words: “all men are created equal”. They meant should have equal opportunity.
But, as we know, equal opportunity is not easy. Often political division results from a sense that American law and commerce is weighted toward favored groups who emerge and lock in their advantage. Elon Musk holds out for a trillion dollar pay package. Homes sell for tens of millions while many have to work overtime to afford to pay rent. Or, as inflation bites, the privileged pay thousands to buy white truffles by the pound.
I wonder, what if sitting around the Thanksgiving table somebody asked, “have we abandoned unifying principles and realities that held us together?”
To this question I would turn to a universal principle: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”—it is one of the most widely shared moral principles across human civilizations. It appears in some form in nearly every major religious and philosophical tradition. Right now it is a revolutionary principle and we need a revolution—a revolution that must be led outside the corridors of power.
Happy Thanksgiving.
Betsi Shays
Betsi Shays died recently. She and her husband Chris were good friends and my wife and I have shared the family’s grief. As I think about Thanksgiving, I want to share this column about Betsi from the Greenwich Sentinel. Chris had been a Member of Congress from Connecticut.
https://www.greenwichsentinel.com/2025/11/14/editorial-remembering-betsi-shays/
Al Sikes is the former Chair of the Federal Communications Commission under George H.W. Bush. Al writes on themes from his book, Culture Leads Leaders Follow published by Koehler Books.
The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.
by Hugh Panero

The song “Walk My Walk,” by the band Breaking Rust, recently hit number one on the Billboard Country Digital Song Sales chart in November 2025. What was particularly interesting, and scary, was that it was entirely AI-generated, the first time an AI-generated song topped the US Billboard chart, generating millions of streams. As of November, 3-4 million on Spotify and 11 million streams on YouTube.
I heard the song a few weeks ago. I liked it along with other songs by the band (“Livin’ on Borrowed Time” and “Whiskey Don’t Talk Back”), which also generated big streaming numbers. They all have a distinctive country blues sound. I shared a link to the song “Walk My Walk” with family and friends for a listen using Spotify. Hear it on YouTube.
I wanted to know more about the band and the vocalist, but it was hard to find, which was odd given how much basic marketing music labels do to promote bands. I eventually discovered that the song was AI-generated by the creator Aubierre Rivaldo Taylor. AI music has been creeping onto the music charts recently, and what seemed only an existential threat to artists is now here and number 1 on the charts.
According to the AI chat platform ChatGPT, the song was created by the AI music platform Suno. There are no human performers. Even the singer’s “gravely Southern drawl” in the song, made to sound like a human artist like Chris Stapleton, was AI-generated, as were the rugged cowboy still and video images that depicted the artist’s fictional persona.
I listen to a lot of music, worked as a satellite music content distributor for a long time, and I couldn’t tell that it was AI-generated. When I learned it was, I thought of my favorite sci-fi film, Blade Runner, starring Harrison Ford as a futuristic detective tasked with hunting down dangerous synthetic humanoid robots called Replicants.
In the movie, the only way to know whether someone was human or a replicant was to administer a test that measured involuntary physiological responses to emotionally provocative questions. The test assesses empathy by hypothesizing that a human’s empathetic response will differ from a replicant’s.
The music industry is going to need a lot of Blade Runner AI detectives to determine whether a song was created by human artistry or AI, a distinction this AI song has blurred. Its popularity has reignited the heated debate about AI and the future of music creation by living and breathing artists.
AI models like Suno are trained using vast amounts of copyrighted music from existing databases without the explicit consent or compensation of the original creators, unless side deals are made similar to those OpenAI has made with newspapers and other content providers.
The use of this data to create new, commercially successful songs, without compensation, is seen by artists and music labels as theft, raising questions about intellectual property rights in the world of AI.
How much of “Walk My Walk” came out of digital fragments of works from artists, dead or alive, and how should they or their estates be compensated? Let the lawsuits begin. Several major entities, including music labels and organizations representing independent artists, have sued Suno, a venture-backed AI company, for copyright infringement.
I am on the artist’s side. Our culture romanticizes the artistic process: the poor, struggling musician pouring out their emotions, scribbling notes and lyrics on scraps of paper, waiting for their big break. We lived through this right of passage for iconic artists like Bob Dylan, Joni Mitchell, and Bruce Springsteen, and it continues today.
However, when cheaply produced AI-generated music competes for listener attention alongside human-created music, it can and will reduce the earnings potential for human artists, especially new artists struggling to make a living. The music industry’s royalty models and federal legislation are outdated and wildly ill-equipped to handle the rise of machine-generated content.
The music industry as a whole has not engendered much goodwill over the years. The industry culture is for labels to mimic successful artists to reduce risk. Pop music sounds wildly overproduced and less authentic. Music labels act like banks rather than creative shops as they used to be. Giant digital distributors like Spotify dominate the business, and monopolistic concert companies like Live Nation and ticket scalpers have driven up ticket prices to the point of being out of reach for many consumers due to rampant price gouging by bad actors.
The word ‘derivative’ in the music world has two meanings: one relating to copyright law and the other to critical and compositional discussions. In the latter, a work is described as “derivative” if it sounds unoriginal, heavily imitative, or lacks fresh solutions.
Under U.S. copyright law, a “derivative work” is a new, original work that is based on or incorporates substantial copyrightable elements of one or more pre-existing works. This differs from a standard cover song (i.e, Harold Arlen’s “Over the Rainbow”), which is a straightforward interpretation of the original, with minimal changes to the core melody or lyrics.
Legally, you must get explicit permission from the original copyright holder to create and distribute a derivative work. The original copyright holder reserves the exclusive right to authorize adaptations of their work. For example, remixes, mashups, and medleys; musical arrangements that significantly alter the original melody, harmony, or lyrics; song translations into a different language, and works that heavily sample an existing sound recording.
Tech giants’ rapid innovation has allowed, even encouraged, widespread copyright infringement. AI will obliterate the quaint definition of derivative work. Imagine every song ever copyrighted ingested into an AI platform like Suno, which analyzes a user’s text prompt describing the style, mood, or genre of a song they want to create, which might include specific instructions or phrases, as well as a request for a cool Santana-like guitar riff. And VIOLA!
We have to support artists, and need a new regulatory framework to protect the integrity of the music industry, requiring at a minimum:
Mandatory AI Transparency: Clear labeling of AI-generated music to help listeners make informed choices.
Build Forensic AI Models: We need AI tools that can uncover the digital building blocks underlying AI-generated content, enabling us to determine artist compensation.
Create New Federal Regulations: Congress needs to update copyright laws to address the challenges posed by AI. Prioritizing artist consent and fair compensation.
The live concert experience is safe from the AI monster, since it is impossible for an AI algorithm to replicate the feeling of seeing your favorite artists perform live.
I recently attended the Natalie Merchant concert at the Avalon in Easton, MD. I have followed her since her days with 10,000 Manics. At 62, performing an acoustic set with only a guitarist, her voice remains strong and authentic. She interacted with the crowd with warmth and humor, something an algorithm cannot do, at least for now – Thank God for that.
Hugh Panero, a tech and media entrepreneur, was the founder and former CEO of XM Satellite Radio. He has worked with leading tech venture capital firms and was an adjunct media professor at George Washington University. He writes about Tech, Media, and other stuff for the Spy.
The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Veterans Day, born as Armistice Day, reminds us of the debt that Americans owe to service members who have fallen in battle. There is a small and dwindling number of World War II combatants alive to receive our thanks, and there are none from earlier conflicts alive today. In 1944, our government saw fit to create an unprecedented mechanism for expressing our gratitude. The Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944 (P.L. 78-346), the GI Bill of Rights, had broader goals than any preceding laws concerning veteran benefits. It was designed to enable veterans to resume their lives as contributing citizens and to help them and their families thrive.
It began with educational benefits and housing assistance. It provided the equivalent of unemployment benefits during education and job searches, and it helped with many other obstacles to success after leaving the military. Some of early GI Bill programs proved ineffective, especially housing, but decades of amendments and related legislation followed to increase their impact. New legislation followed with similar goals and benefits, written to extend eligibility to survivors of subsequent military conflicts, including post-9/11 deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan. Congressional Research Report R42785 (June 2024) documents the history of these laws.
The GI Bill’s education benefits made my family’s success easier, and the same is true for millions of other Baby Boomers. The same benefits and opportunities were denied to Black, Hispanic, Asian, and gay and lesbian veterans, and the unpaid debt to them has been compounding ever since. The lost education, income, housing assistance, and other benefits they earned have been passed on to their heirs, multiplying the injustice. There were many decisions that kept the benefits of the GI Bill and related laws from reaching all eligible veterans. This is not a suitable forum for presenting the whys and wherefores of these failures to ensure equal protection under law. Books such as “The Wounded Generation” and “When Affirmative Action Was White” tell the story in detail. Efforts to right these wrongs continue to the present. The “Sgt. Issac Woodard, Jr. and Sgt. Joseph H. Maddox G.I. Bill Restoration Act” was introduced in Congress four times between 2021 and 2025. None of these bills received committee consideration.
These injustices unfolded during my lifetime, so they are relevant to me in very personal ways. Wealth and health inequality are symptoms of the unpaid debt. Were those veterans who were denied benefits so different from my father? It weighs heavily on my conscience, and the misfortunes suffered by their families multiply the weight. In justifying these systemic failures, parallels have been drawn to proposals to pay reparations to enslaved people and their descendants. There are two critical differences. First, the GI Bill was a US law, and its intent was to help all eligible veterans become full participants in the land of opportunity. Second, these injustices were carried out by my parents’ generation in recent memory, not very long ago. They’re being perpetuated by my generation and my children’s. I am ashamed that the debt goes on unpaid, and I wonder why outrage has never grown stronger.
David E. Schindel
Hurlock
The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.